Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> > I think though that the IRT (lifetime) option might appear to make
> > sense as a sub-option, while many other options pretty obviously
> > don't make sense. So I'm happy to add the wording, just to avoid
> > possible misuse.
>
> this is exactly my point.
>
>  I believe it depends on whether we want to avoid possible misuse
>  explicitly.  And then it depends on how we asses the possibility of
>  the misuse.  Of course, the sense on this may vary among people (so I
>  won't push my preference).  But if we recall that we are talking
>  about this in the context where we are trying to add a note that a
>  single IRT (or lifetime) optin should be common for all possible
>  information resources, I personally think it's reasonable to add an
>  explicit note here.

I also think it is worthwhile to add text limiting this option's position to 
the message options.

Joe.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg