Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option

Joe Quanaim <jdq@lucent.com> Tue, 07 September 2004 13:25 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA20676; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:25:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C4fos-0006OJ-KZ; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:15:34 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C4fhx-00055d-33 for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:08:25 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA19414 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:08:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hoemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.226.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C4flN-0003kM-M6 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:11:58 -0400
Received: from homail.ho.lucent.com (h135-17-192-10.lucent.com [135.17.192.10]) by hoemail1.lucent.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i87D82gm014119; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 08:08:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from kraken.mh.lucent.com by homail.ho.lucent.com (8.11.7+Sun/EMS-1.5 sol2) id i87D80101458; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:08:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Joe Quanaim <jdq@lucent.com>
To: JINMEI Tatuya / =?utf-8?q?=E7=A5=9E=E6=98=8E=E9=81=94=E5=93=89=09?=<jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>, Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:07:59 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <y7vy8jt3u2u.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <20040903075617.GA22032@sverresborg.uninett.no> <y7vpt521ro4.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
In-Reply-To: <y7vpt521ro4.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200409070907.59505.jdq@lucent.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, "'Ted Lemon'" <mellon@nominum.com>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jdq@lucent.com
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> > I think though that the IRT (lifetime) option might appear to make
> > sense as a sub-option, while many other options pretty obviously
> > don't make sense. So I'm happy to add the wording, just to avoid
> > possible misuse.
>
> this is exactly my point.
>
>  I believe it depends on whether we want to avoid possible misuse
>  explicitly.  And then it depends on how we asses the possibility of
>  the misuse.  Of course, the sense on this may vary among people (so I
>  won't push my preference).  But if we recall that we are talking
>  about this in the context where we are trying to add a note that a
>  single IRT (or lifetime) optin should be common for all possible
>  information resources, I personally think it's reasonable to add an
>  explicit note here.

I also think it is worthwhile to add text limiting this option's position to 
the message options.

Joe.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg