RE: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option

"Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 25 August 2004 01:54 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA02805; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:54:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BzmZ8-0005qU-9V; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:27:06 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bzm4z-0000qU-Hb for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:55:57 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA28532 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:55:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bzm5W-0004xU-F1 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:56:31 -0400
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2004 18:00:17 -0700
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i7P0tGiQ020140; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from volzw2k (che-vpn-cluster-1-156.cisco.com [10.86.240.156]) by flask.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id ALB56826; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:55:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "'Ted Lemon'" <mellon@nominum.com>, =?utf-8?B?J0pJTk1FSSBUYXR1eWEgLyDCkF/igJPCvuKAmULCjcOGJw==?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:55:14 -0400
Organization: Cisco
Message-ID: <001401c48a3e$2ededf20$6401a8c0@amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.5709
In-Reply-To: <EBBCE159-F510-11D8-AE27-000A95D9C74C@nominum.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4939.300
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If it is restricted to a REPLY to an INFORMATION-REQUEST, there is no need for this explicit statement as that's all that is currently possible - there are no IA_NA, IA_TA, or IA_PD options for these messages.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 10:30 AM
> To: JINMEI Tatuya / _–¾’BÆ
> Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option
> 
> 
> On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:27 AM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> > We should also restrict the position where the lifetime option can
> > appear: it should only be able to appear at the "top level" 
> of option 
> > hierarchy.
> 
> I think this is a good idea.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg