IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 October 2015 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552531AD367; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94LHqqmsuh4C; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2911AD365; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgt47 with SMTP id 47so182406845qgt.2; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 11:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2JBa8+kqo/o3CiYT/lEErEaSANzAFzCD6ZWepUMMWOQ=; b=Rm96Nv+9WXRS9vFW6MaNR7lGw+eg/HmJHvi5Xes5VLeLmqFRyaP5n4y3NKn9n4mhP8 +4+1mD+qg7jsQ4IC8GuRDsXVQ/DMah+3iLaFCXrQzi7GmRiLDm7gYIi/JgHqHhf6mF3r 38ql+XSbcQvv9wPoFKvnqjPVg9T/YLy6nfHSibxFnYMqaUBsrKU1Tf1bcHXdfvLLaX3f WG29WYTx99sAboyQ/uMz0fA6I/BPfW5g33irRFWZqSI6uAlbmXtrZmXFypwIy8PooP6U 7wCcRPjZ+uYk4wJXdFcNxD3SuDq3efamha2xc5Q1aU7eY/FNihzx5kUCWIifN0RF8b7N EGNQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.18.240 with SMTP id 103mr50280062qgf.31.1444156223576; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 11:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (209-6-114-252.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com. [209.6.114.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f19sm14329934qhc.18.2015.10.06.11.30.22 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Oct 2015 11:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
In-Reply-To: <5FA8DBF9-2FF9-4E60-8B2B-11CE01502D75@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:30:21 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F79AEBBF-BC21-4E5D-A3FE-515A13A18D00@gmail.com>
References: <20150930035228.20755.429.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <19846C62-DF4F-402B-A7A6-9D2CE69BD9B3@cisco.com> <2BA9B2AC-116A-4FE5-BA17-AC8758B5C212@nostrum.com> <0F3826E4-13C7-4348-9271-5439A3304572@cisco.com> <C847544D-A1AE-4732-9BC6-1C5983A12527@nostrum.com> <6AE185BE-DC68-434E-B17E-0AFB8FE46B70@cisco.com> <CAHbuEH5nK=sFNbfpdAKFgpOY6RAD7DSKC5VE5HjSqQ3o_E+-eQ@mail.gmail.com> <3A63D1E0-4257-40CC-BBA2-CC08C5B70892@cisco.com> <5FA8DBF9-2FF9-4E60-8B2B-11CE01502D75@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/_iAqyREYYkMYb0N_3JzlIOyxaYc>
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:30:26 -0000


Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 6, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 6, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Ben said:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the explanation. We discussed this on the telechat today, and the security ADs are okay without the secure mode being MTI. So I guess I am, as well.
> 
> Looks like I misunderstood the discussion, so please take the security ADs word about their opinions over mine. :-)

I'm okay with the current wording, but do see Ben's point on MTI vs. MTU.  There isn't a mention of what's MTI, just text on MTU that are typically aimed at different people.  Since it is in line with IPv6, it's okay to leave as-is.  It might be confusing for developers though.

Thanks,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email