IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 06 October 2015 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F6D1AD0C6; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhwrvgs138wk; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31EF11AD0B8; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.144.46.226] (mobile-166-173-185-145.mycingular.net [166.173.185.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t96IJT5Q076982 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:19:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host mobile-166-173-185-145.mycingular.net [166.173.185.145] claimed to be [10.144.46.226]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13A452)
In-Reply-To: <3A63D1E0-4257-40CC-BBA2-CC08C5B70892@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:19:23 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5FA8DBF9-2FF9-4E60-8B2B-11CE01502D75@nostrum.com>
References: <20150930035228.20755.429.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <19846C62-DF4F-402B-A7A6-9D2CE69BD9B3@cisco.com> <2BA9B2AC-116A-4FE5-BA17-AC8758B5C212@nostrum.com> <0F3826E4-13C7-4348-9271-5439A3304572@cisco.com> <C847544D-A1AE-4732-9BC6-1C5983A12527@nostrum.com> <6AE185BE-DC68-434E-B17E-0AFB8FE46B70@cisco.com> <CAHbuEH5nK=sFNbfpdAKFgpOY6RAD7DSKC5VE5HjSqQ3o_E+-eQ@mail.gmail.com> <3A63D1E0-4257-40CC-BBA2-CC08C5B70892@cisco.com>
To: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/gJL7d_XDylm9fLvol8n_drX3QEk>
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:19:39 -0000


Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 6, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Ben said:
> 
>> 
>> Thanks for the explanation. We discussed this on the telechat today, and the security ADs are okay without the secure mode being MTI. So I guess I am, as well.

Looks like I misunderstood the discussion, so please take the security ADs word about their opinions over mine. :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email