[Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels
"dime issue tracker" <trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org> Wed, 23 September 2015 13:48 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C271B30CB for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r_50VcccgqAz for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80C4B1B30CC for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:50413 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1ZekPf-0001iD-R1; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:48:47 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: dime issue tracker <trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-dime-drmp@tools.ietf.org, jean-jacques.trottin@alcatel-lucent.com
X-Trac-Project: dime
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:48:47 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/92
Message-ID: <081.b70b3dea6f29d62d9ab549868a75dbb7@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 92
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-dime-drmp@tools.ietf.org, jean-jacques.trottin@alcatel-lucent.com, dime@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To:
Resent-Message-Id: <20150923134849.80C4B1B30CC@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:48:49 -0700
Resent-From: trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/-3Pnzh5_a5R5fBBc1f7H5A9-yn4>
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: dime@ietf.org
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:48:55 -0000
#92: Range of priority levels The ietf-dime-drmp draft currently mentions 5 levels of priorities which appear to be not enough. In 3GPP, levels of priorities are also defined outside Diameter with, in particular, sixteen levels in Policy Control for the ARP (Allocation and Retention Priority)information element. So it would be better that the DRMP AVP also allow 16 values which is future proof and leaves more flexibility on their allocation. Another point also addressed in #91 ticket is that the range can contain priorities which are higher or lower than the normal priority corresponding to the case where the DRMP AVP is not present (existing situation); this also drives to consider a larger range of levels with an intermediate value corresponding to the normal priority. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jean-jacques.trottin | Owner: draft-ietf-dime- @alcatel-lucent.com | drmp@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: drmp | Version: Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/92> dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/>
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… Lee, Jay
- [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels dime issue tracker
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… DOLLY, MARTIN C
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… lionel.morand
- [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels Jay Lee
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… DOLLY, MARTIN C
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… DOLLY, MARTIN C
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… Shaikh, Viqar A
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… Steve Donovan
- [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re: [di… ken carlberg
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… DOLLY, MARTIN C
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority l… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… DOLLY, MARTIN C
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… Shaikh, Viqar A
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… Lee, Jay
- [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re: [di… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… DOLLY, MARTIN C
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-se… Lee, Jay
- [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-serb a… jgunn6
- Re: [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-se… Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] diff-serb and two other ideas (was Re:… jgunn6
- Re: [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-se… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-se… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-se… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-se… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-se… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-se… Lee, Jay
- Re: [Dime] Two meanings for "default" Re: diff-se… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)