Re: [Dime] WG adoption call for draft-zorn-dime-rfc4005bis-01

Sebastien Decugis <sdecugis@nict.go.jp> Mon, 09 August 2010 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sdecugis@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1E53A6901 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 18:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.239, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id os6skC+JhOXS for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 18:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sd-11965.dedibox.fr (sd-11965.dedibox.fr [88.191.67.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DC73A6891 for <dime@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 18:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sd-11965.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2DB27DD0; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 03:19:48 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at sd-11965.dedibox.fr
Received: from sd-11965.dedibox.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sd-11965.dedibox.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcqGLahWpGfk; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 03:19:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [202.249.37.5] (morbier.koganei.wide.ad.jp [202.249.37.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sd-11965.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0543027DCE; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 03:19:44 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C5F57A1.8090400@nict.go.jp>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:19:29 +0900
From: Sebastien Decugis <sdecugis@nict.go.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
References: <A0A5F8D2-62B7-40BF-A9C2-8ED231D6323E@gmail.com><4C5A5F2D.20508@nict.go.jp> <001c01cb346e$d7f9a460$87eced20$@net><4C5A6DA9.30309@nict.go.jp> <003201cb347a$0fb844a0$2f28cde0$@net> <4C5B65DB.3040006@nict.go.jp> <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE0CBB2CB1@ftrdmel1> <4C5BD20E.9080802@nict.go.jp> <004a01cb3562$34d91460$9e8b3d20$@net>
In-Reply-To: <004a01cb3562$34d91460$9e8b3d20$@net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] WG adoption call for draft-zorn-dime-rfc4005bis-01
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:19:17 -0000

 Hi,

>> Yes, my concern was about interconnecting different domains together,
>> when some of the domains want to move to Diameter. In this situation, a
>> translation mechanism is mandatory, I think.
> Justification, please?
Well, if domain A "speaks" only Diameter, I don't see how domain B who
speaks RADIUS can interconnect, except with a translation mechanism.

Best regards,
Sebastien.


-- 
Sebastien Decugis
Research fellow
Network Architecture Group
NICT (nict.go.jp)