[Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 10 July 2012 14:46 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BBD11E8088 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.381
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.381 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zLKMATzuECNe for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B0411E8085 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6AEkufb004270; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:46:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6AEktj7028181; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:46:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4FFC405F.9030508@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:46:55 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime mailing list <dime@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060600010701080301030404"
Subject: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:46:31 -0000
Dear all, Glen, Please find below the AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt The document is in a good enough shape to be sent to IETF LC. Please consider my comments together with the other IETF LC comments. Glen, let me know if you plan on submitting a quick revision soon, or if I should send THIS version to the IETF LC (which might lead to redundant comment) - Some idnits http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == The document seems to use 'NOT RECOMMENDED' as an RFC 2119 keyword, but does not include the phrase in its RFC 2119 key words list. Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == Missing Reference: 'BASE' is mentioned on line 219, but not defined I understand that this is a quote from RFC4005. To avoid the source of confusion, here is a proposal OLD: However, the presence of an instance of the Acct-Application-Id AVP was required in RFC 4005, as well: The ACR message [BASE] is sent by the NAS to report its session information to a target server downstream. Either of Acct-Application-Id or Vendor-Specific-Application-Id AVPs MUST be present. If the Vendor-Specific-Application-Id grouped AVP is present, it must have an Acct-Application-Id inside. NEW: However, the presence of an instance of the Acct-Application-Id AVP was required in RFC 4005, which quotes: "The ACR message [BASE] is sent by the NAS to report its session information to a target server downstream. Either of Acct-Application-Id or Vendor-Specific-Application-Id AVPs MUST be present. If the Vendor-Specific-Application-Id grouped AVP is present, it must have an Acct-Application-Id inside." - One small improvement OLD: o The accounting model to be used is now specified. NEW o The accounting model to be used is now specified. See section 1.6 - Expand on the first ASA occurrence - Add an point after [I-D.ietf-dime-rfc3588bis] 3.1. AA-Request (AAR) Command The AA-Request (AAR), which is indicated by setting the Command-Code field to 265 and the 'R' bit in the Command Flags field, is used to request authentication and/or authorization for a given NAS user. The type of request is identified through the Auth-Request-Type AVP [I-D.ietf-dime-rfc3588bis] The recommended value for most situations is AUTHORIZE_AUTHENTICATE. - I could not find the meaning of * in, for example, [ CHAP-Auth ] [ CHAP-Challenge ] * [ Framed-Compression ] [ Framed-Interface-Id ] [ Framed-IP-Address ] * [ Framed-IPv6-Prefix ] [ Framed-IP-Netmask ] [ Framed-MTU ] [ Framed-Protocol ] [ ARAP-Password ] [ ARAP-Security ] * [ ARAP-Security-Data ] * [ Login-IP-Host ] * [ Login-IPv6-Host ] [ Login-LAT-Group ] [ Login-LAT-Node ] [ Login-LAT-Port ] [ Login-LAT-Service ] * [ Tunneling ] * [ Proxy-Info ] * [ Route-Record ] * [ AVP ] - 3.7. Abort-Session-Request (ASR) Command The Abort-Session-Request (ASR) message [I-D.ietf-dime-rfc3588bis] may be sent by any server to the NAS providing session service, to request that the session identified by the Session-Id be stopped. By "any Diameter server"? like in section 3.3 btw. - IANA Considerations Do we need to change all the "4005" entries in http://www.iana.org/assignments/aaa-parameters/aaa-parameters.xml into "4005bis"? Or to be more correct, the new RFC id for 4005bis? - OLD [RADIUSTypes] IANA, "IANA Radius Attribute Values Registry", <http://www.iana.org/ assignments/radius-types-3>. NEW: [RADIUSTypes] IANA, "IANA Radius Attribute Values Registry", <http://www.iana.org/ assignments/radius-types>. ALTERNATE PROPOSAL [RADIUSTypes] IANA, "IANA Radius Attribute Values Registry", <http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types/radius-types.xml#radius-types-1>. Regards, Benoit.
- [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… dieter.jacobsohn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bi… Benoit Claise