Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt - part 2

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Glen,
>
>>> Actually, I'd like to see some guidance from the IESG; something 
>>> that is both consistent and completethat states the semantics of the 
>>> IANA reference field or, lacking that, a little less anal-retention 
>>> WRT positions which are clearly neither consistent nor complete on 
>>> those semantics.
>> Let me follow up and get back to you.
>> IMHO, this is a blocking factor for the draft next step,
Oups. One typo. You should read : "IMHO, this is NOT a blocking factor 
for the draft next step,"
 From your reply below, you understood it was a mistake.
>> i.e. IETF last-call: this could be solved in parallel.
>> So if you want to produce a new draft version, the IETF last-call 
>> could start.
>
> OK.
Regards, Benoit.