Re: draft survey form

Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM> Thu, 25 April 1991 14:43 UTC

Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA22248; Thu, 25 Apr 91 10:43:26 -0400
Received: from ws28.nisc.sri.com by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA22244; Thu, 25 Apr 91 10:43:25 -0400
Received: by ws28.nisc.sri.com (5.64/SRI-NISC1.1) id AA04888; Thu, 25 Apr 91 07:42:45 -0700
Message-Id: <9104251442.AA04888@ws28.nisc.sri.com>
To: S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Cc: disi
Subject: Re: draft survey form
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1991 07:42:42 -0700
From: Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM>

Date: Wed, 24 Apr 91 16:01:58 +0100
From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk>

> I'd suggest that the best way to achieve this is to have the survey ask for
> a statement according to 9.2.1 of X.519.   This brings out a list of key 
> options, including security support.
> 
> Steve

Steve,

Thank you for your suggestion.  The survey has been distributed, but I
do plan to send out a reminder early next week since the due date for
responses is May 3.  I'll include a reference to Section 9 of X.519 as
a clarification in this reminder.

Ruth

p.s. If anyone has any other clarification suggestions, please send
them before 4/29.  FYI - we have received only 2 responses thusfar.
If you know someone that should be filling out the survey form,
encourage them to get busy.