Re: draft survey form
Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM> Thu, 25 April 1991 14:43 UTC
Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA22248; Thu, 25 Apr 91 10:43:26 -0400
Received: from ws28.nisc.sri.com by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA22244; Thu, 25 Apr 91 10:43:25 -0400
Received: by ws28.nisc.sri.com (5.64/SRI-NISC1.1) id AA04888; Thu, 25 Apr 91 07:42:45 -0700
Message-Id: <9104251442.AA04888@ws28.nisc.sri.com>
To: S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Cc: disi
Subject: Re: draft survey form
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1991 07:42:42 -0700
From: Ruth Lang <rlang@NISC.SRI.COM>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 91 16:01:58 +0100 From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk> > I'd suggest that the best way to achieve this is to have the survey ask for > a statement according to 9.2.1 of X.519. This brings out a list of key > options, including security support. > > Steve Steve, Thank you for your suggestion. The survey has been distributed, but I do plan to send out a reminder early next week since the due date for responses is May 3. I'll include a reference to Section 9 of X.519 as a clarification in this reminder. Ruth p.s. If anyone has any other clarification suggestions, please send them before 4/29. FYI - we have received only 2 responses thusfar. If you know someone that should be filling out the survey form, encourage them to get busy.
- draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Tim Howes
- Re: draft survey form James M Galvin
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang
- Re: draft survey form Tim Howes
- Re: draft survey form James M Galvin
- Re: draft survey form Steve Kille
- Re: draft survey form Ruth Lang