IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] New version for the Alert-Info URNs draft: draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-00.txt

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Thu, 29 October 2009 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01D83A6955 for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jN6zSi3k1qQa for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019533A6942 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-3.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAJ5N6UqrR7H+/2dsb2JhbADGG5gThD0E
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,646,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="199860695"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2009 15:11:55 +0000
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9TFBkRa010873; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:11:55 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:11:54 -0400
Received: from [161.44.182.250] ([161.44.182.250]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:11:54 -0400
Message-ID: <4AE9B0BA.7080008@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:11:54 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Francois AUDET <audet.francois@gmail.com>
References: <40FB0FFB97588246A1BEFB05759DC8A0038854EC@S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de> <4ADCCF93.2070208@cisco.com> <40FB0FFB97588246A1BEFB05759DC8A003885F8F@S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de> <4ADFB028.3010604@cisco.com> <4AE99CFE.9030205@sipstation.com> <5147C5BC-C186-4CFB-A604-F0FAF0162465@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5147C5BC-C186-4CFB-A604-F0FAF0162465@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2009 15:11:54.0483 (UTC) FILETIME=[265D8C30:01CA58AA]
Cc: "anwars@avaya.com" <anwars@avaya.com>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, "L.Liess@telekom.de" <L.Liess@telekom.de>, "R.Jesske@telekom.de" <R.Jesske@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] New version for the Alert-Info URNs draft: draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:11:39 -0000

Francois AUDET wrote:
> What about reverting the tree order, so that you put the country id 
> last, so you can ignore it if you don't care?
> 
> Urn:tones.alerting.Albanian

Yeah, that had occurred to me.

But I think Adam's point was that you can find other orderings that make 
more sense in other contexts:

URN:tones.alerting.Albanian.short vs. URN:tones.alerting.short.Albanian

It may actually be the case that a combination of a hierarchy for some 
things, and independent values (dimensions) for other things might work 
out. But I'm just thinking out loud.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email