Re: [dispatch] New version for the Alert-Info URNs draft: draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-00.txt

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

Dean Willis wrote:
> Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> 
>> But that works more easily if the Alert-Info URNs are mutually
>> exclusive, so the recipient just chooses one it understands and renders
>> that.
>>
>> But I guess it can still work in the multi-dimensional approach. Each
>> URN that is understood must imply the values of one or more of those
>> dimensions.
> 
> this is starting to sound like multipart/related and multipart/alternative.
> 
> Perhaps we are barking up the wrong tree, and alerts should be body
> parts selected by a new content-disposition?

Did you imply a smiley on this message?

On the off chance that you did not, its important that it be possible 
for intermediaries to add the Alert-Info, which pretty much excludes 
using body parts.

	Thanks,
	Paul