IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc and forwarding

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 30 January 2014 23:53 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3BB1A04DB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:53:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErAUxWodQ1m9 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC7F1A04DD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id kq14so3770072pab.17 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:53:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vOb3vV1XGFSrk3C0imPe2mwRoJfPtRtHo+x7WfCsG74=; b=uIQu1dDRHwO5KEdOlnku3Nniq8iRxooF0OfmerRUBhP3qyf0FygB7Th+vS03NyhBeo PN4CYCDtDGH8j6wFLwrBhWuSDKAcizhtvq4ONT1r/JIm7eTBEZ6B3SSB1cb0KuecAM/Z zYexuY11oYesBJccIuI4uD2CxzvFlcbJApdLePQQWDaNgj5J5AaSQyGK1vZfR2xYoUN5 YIEG5+GbIJZLEP0dgCy9IsrhtlVQFg58tj/3CWj8LddRW9uGpg7/DlgB2Sc+7osJh3rF XOIjrCT2j/Sq9eDkSlSXUM3hAlAN1htYRJFBuOihJlsnSaGexBhpnGmp51VOi2skDeWn OmLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.118.71 with SMTP id kk7mr17403181pab.14.1391126032008; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:53:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.234.105 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:53:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140130225152.GA27685@roeckx.be>
References: <20140130220330.GA25608@roeckx.be> <52EACDBF.2050003@bluepopcorn.net> <20140130222320.GB25641@roeckx.be> <WM!6bb3f78a7feaec45cd6e16db08822359f618288053561e2a2c08e397644e063795fab5be7076e0d2e8163de4e710e3ff!@asav-2.01.com> <1762762424.26365.1391121588323.JavaMail.zimbra@peachymango.org> <20140130225152.GA27685@roeckx.be>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:53:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbpy7R0gF9YPXJwFqrYr0F_ESxjLFS7ZSaxxTHpBF6KPA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8ffbad05f9ce2504f138c4a6"
Cc: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, Franck Martin <franck@peachymango.org>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc and forwarding
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:53:56 -0000

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> wrote:

>
> It seems to me that this part of the discussion is not useful at
> all, and doesn't answer any of the questions I had.  It's also not
> important where or why it breaks, since I suspect this nothing
> that is new.  But I'm also pretty sure it's none of my hosts that
> break it.  If you really feel like discussing this I suggest we
> take that to somewhere else.
>
>
I don't agree, since DMARC is predicated in part on the notion that DKIM
has become sufficiently reliable in general as to be a viable building
block upon which to build things like DMARC.  Your question is based on the
idea that your experience is the opposite.  Naturally, we're curious.

I believe the questions you're getting are actually attempts to help.  Are
you sure swatting their hands is the right response?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email