IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc and forwarding

Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Thu, 30 January 2014 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EA71A04DD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:51:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id idxOTOOZZi2C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from defiant.e-webshops.eu (defiant.e-webshops.eu [82.146.122.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EA91A04DE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by defiant.e-webshops.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C751C215E; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:51:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 099F91FE0279; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:51:52 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:51:52 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Franck Martin <franck@peachymango.org>
Message-ID: <20140130225152.GA27685@roeckx.be>
References: <20140130220330.GA25608@roeckx.be> <52EACDBF.2050003@bluepopcorn.net> <20140130222320.GB25641@roeckx.be> <WM!6bb3f78a7feaec45cd6e16db08822359f618288053561e2a2c08e397644e063795fab5be7076e0d2e8163de4e710e3ff!@asav-2.01.com> <1762762424.26365.1391121588323.JavaMail.zimbra@peachymango.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1762762424.26365.1391121588323.JavaMail.zimbra@peachymango.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc and forwarding
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 22:51:58 -0000

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:39:48PM -0600, Franck Martin wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kurt Roeckx" <kurt@roeckx.be>
> > To: "Jim Fenton" <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
> > Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:23:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc and forwarding
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:10:07PM -0800, Jim Fenton wrote:
> > > On 1/30/14 2:03 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > Please don't say that DKIM is a fallback.  90% of the e-mails
> > > > with DKIM that I receive have a bad DKIM signature.
> > > Wow, that seems really high.  These are legitimate messages?
> > 
> > Yes, those are real messages.
> > 
> 
> It seems to me that all the emails sent to you go via first an email gateway before landing on your mail server

It seems to me that this part of the discussion is not useful at
all, and doesn't answer any of the questions I had.  It's also not
important where or why it breaks, since I suspect this nothing
that is new.  But I'm also pretty sure it's none of my hosts that
break it.  If you really feel like discussing this I suggest we
take that to somewhere else.

PS: I strongly suggest you all stop using anything lower than 2048
bit to do DKIM.


Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email