Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc and forwarding

Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Thu, 30 January 2014 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736051A04F4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:23:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id takxEFD4oWIR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from defiant.e-webshops.eu (defiant.e-webshops.eu [82.146.122.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2D21A04CC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by defiant.e-webshops.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2791C215E; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:23:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40EA51FE0279; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:23:20 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:23:20 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
Message-ID: <20140130222320.GB25641@roeckx.be>
References: <20140130220330.GA25608@roeckx.be> <52EACDBF.2050003@bluepopcorn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52EACDBF.2050003@bluepopcorn.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc and forwarding
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 22:23:25 -0000

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:10:07PM -0800, Jim Fenton wrote:
> On 1/30/14 2:03 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Please don't say that DKIM is a fallback.  90% of the e-mails
> > with DKIM that I receive have a bad DKIM signature.
> Wow, that seems really high.  These are legitimate messages?

Yes, those are real messages.


Kurt