IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken

Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com> Fri, 27 July 2018 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@sethblank.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEC8130FFF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kRzGyVUJv7Mg for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE05F130E6B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id y207-v6so10472199oie.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jke71iWwWdmOIE3B5dDZXkAsNB7ubUFFjnbfGEfBhlY=; b=q8hrFyP4jIyz47B4wv46/SsLIdlWwg/1liV8gxlIpjVDsZPFtHHF8pQuM9X4ecZUMO lw/NCa+5EJDZ5vAyUGp3sRouk92ms5wxHLqvOH/5kYpcyRVjbMX60BVQJPFUKKWTTA+3 mumOywREVcW6CnZS16W3hG8HviBwFGJ+JdxD/lWhNqggtx8c1YG+J6Yj0fLe1a4hbDtg tzMhFAbGQOApPcmhp7gTzIrMZjbXtLTcMzt9vI26qCNGLty/5hMw8cPRpiaOjdOHhdnE BL0RDIqHDGXPgTM+LzTf7JDKd/1FLngxZJzvuPtQtRKJUjxH5HiCzsJAxK8W3TFwTigM 0ROQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jke71iWwWdmOIE3B5dDZXkAsNB7ubUFFjnbfGEfBhlY=; b=gPujU3YBuJOdDd1/P4lCfRUpur3UO4GqUssVJxPt3z30gTo1X+D0dU2GzDHJcf0H4p 2mzVF4Fh2LdTtnNKBbW6DkxORZ4xCemcCYzLOBPY+ea+G+nDeI22ti6/QGwA8alxTW4N hCvX0w/H+XZBbtd/PByNBNvL/VYvPgbtfAohtZNHQHKBdKEpng+T0udj2nVGO6PmtpgN 7gf/RDqatgsbqsFD+tIH1QVzngK8yf0MzW/Vk2awP5esjhj4w1Y0I5xI0JIV9c95jbkt RwGWulHFuS90TzEoX6Ve/jY9cMWDzqVEoWycK/LPXgaAR3Nce0ltWUSc4hDruA51DfFU ergA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlF3xMk4wtTOSE1W//oCqFB5/pKPcyf9lIErJMtVdnIzxYBI7Bu+ OljSdknCCxEhaxVGvhvuduYQLICPygW0w8RuQHbSpwy5Ofg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcDAdDEK3zpF6AI23lvXMuKBFZscKiJObNgKl2b1lzA++P9VeMHqN3M5PWDX819naiLyD0C5Hk9C0bQ093q9YU=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:b355:: with SMTP id c82-v6mr7957243oif.9.1532713453799; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:2646:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3653158.NzzCYWEyKs@kitterma-e6430>
References: <CAD2i3WOZmFxSdmKZ6MEzNspcQt9JK8mKSv3zj83as3DPydVPGg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1807271000040.61865@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwbPAfoNTp-__HV3V-RQggUZY_TmdjBRzeg=ECGK0STuhw@mail.gmail.com> <3653158.NzzCYWEyKs@kitterma-e6430>
From: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:43:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD2i3WNsMgd7v6t_UWt18ShceW33H8LcCH8RQVf8o5KpCWfh1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f4d86b0571fea82b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/7OQUD3wjMhxoJFUeHESsHOsRTTw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:44:17 -0000

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> And if you don't want to make a new one, 5.7.26 (Multiple authentication
> checks failed) seems at least not wrong.  To get to this point DKIM,
> DMARC,
> and ARC have failed.
>

Is this better moved into Experimental Considerations?

We could put simple text around if an error code is appropriate or not, and
if so if a new one is needed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email