IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 27 July 2018 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D50D130FF7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=bsWaIJRB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=skVtIhcx
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bruxqiaybaMY for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [208.43.65.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5491A130DF6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201803e; t=1532713269; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from : subject : date; bh=DfmXy7jNSSxKz3N1KgR1C1JA44ueIGzFSIotKh37o0k=; b=bsWaIJRBluLs7BXRp/jhScG4kskqGw+cZ1tcnjr0jpFTdUV+0kXQQPQa WoN1UlLeaI1rWhqP667KcEfQKarLCw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201803r; t=1532713269; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from : subject : date; bh=DfmXy7jNSSxKz3N1KgR1C1JA44ueIGzFSIotKh37o0k=; b=skVtIhcx6v1Eevsiw0FavcnqtAyXGYEyhF5Leivq6g6Pm0Fq/uLQ1QGb mvd7XSeSgs2HhewdccrsMAtOaSn83nb4OliyQ83vg+zWn/Cya1ld1z97VQ +tMYoq79iEvPD0MYBL+O+hCX8Tjgp2rEWFu690sEownFwtwx6VWQHloY3k MsO3td27N/JM9sJIPvZGopUFFdjbvksb+byvgropuzc7Cbxhg1ekQ97AJM X+MVU+b3sKAQuivNVLlu16EoII832Kp6Bd3+vinD1PN6+JQOe6sanN4Fa8 EwHH+Lw/EXVX2AfOfQWgX+5+oDNOwziDsiNvgyOSXVgppr3URuBIeg==
Received: from kitterma-e6430.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23CF0C40257 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:41:09 -0500 (CDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 13:41:10 -0400
Message-ID: <3653158.NzzCYWEyKs@kitterma-e6430>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-147-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbPAfoNTp-__HV3V-RQggUZY_TmdjBRzeg=ECGK0STuhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD2i3WOZmFxSdmKZ6MEzNspcQt9JK8mKSv3zj83as3DPydVPGg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1807271000040.61865@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwbPAfoNTp-__HV3V-RQggUZY_TmdjBRzeg=ECGK0STuhw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/XmZ-WVIo_OaeZUgvPLKvrf3W0b4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:41:13 -0000

On Friday, July 27, 2018 10:20:04 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 7:03 AM, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
> > Ah.  I still think it should go, but if you really want to do that, invent
> > a new enhanced status code.  They're cheap.  5.7.7 isn't right, it's more
> > like corrupt S/MIME bodies.
> 
> I did a bunch of these (for DKIM and SPF at least) in RFC7372.  You could
> clone the template from there.

And if you don't want to make a new one, 5.7.26 (Multiple authentication 
checks failed) seems at least not wrong.  To get to this point DKIM, DMARC, 
and ARC have failed.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email