IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 27 July 2018 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5547130FA2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DqkjjV_60nFV for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1400130F9F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id f135-v6so4016126lfg.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ofJhQ0e6jMK/nVS5prjeDHi9zdaSHXZuUKMixSAv5Do=; b=lOMuBrZpmjwRe55BpILlSblLrV46uinzx9gSq9zdmVtfaX4XuS6eIlV3NskLbNs0YN DuFh84WVxk4j7SByivWuzQyKHxDsOKDz1x5GyCs5c35ZuueHPdddZrD9jxlTjuhT2aMa yACUGovl5SHVAt9KkKV9uSHU6rU65BrGR8dRc9XpazmiwLT0WzEIgFzAThh2XPa74xu9 V/joXPTAUwR/VkiU126HPitPMa3k5D0M0whEpCLf0AnSxMOC42hi+iNAsKK8MVV4ZGwi Iwxl/gqpNG1acABp+JHRhhKwJnhqj9E8BDAOI0fkGTNb2XGz4j6yB6L3jOyfGP3yJV4G Sxjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ofJhQ0e6jMK/nVS5prjeDHi9zdaSHXZuUKMixSAv5Do=; b=OLt/2ZzbQE3QGZfNzKFGi/qSaem+DHZZgPcrj1Oeh8X7mnZ3cMBERoTaizGqfQVSTc S5AO7b0Ui3bKHDbdSZ16gXqHs/Wg6GpXS8tcOHrsU0DRNXuTymz/Hh1Cw5nz34Wc+awl ipKv/V9cUxVbDLgCPGiJjuybQTzCTHur82HvTxBns8OdIaEFRm5ViNFo6E9bnxJhoPlL nD9Hu52AkOHzBet574H6tWQ1lJ14OuMP12u4iwOFbm4/1I0oknjfPbGXrw5t8T3rpW3b RbdYZJQDmCsmiCkOaZgpzUysaGAW3HQV2bTkj7Xo8z0UgBILcklBZEtZCWbV7p7VxdOa /8VQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlElVW+1AC2s7/A/FbxIXSLdXsKgezzBBi5t8ItuiPainkWJ3pcs 3FIQ/GcN6evyaI8wjm8YUBLLtXV4p1HuFT+ODjE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcVixWygeK0FbNw7/8j3gsO6WdEk3f4EkMwVZRQ5c0BLB/zB8KHm8dnKjxdTrButQWz2jZbfvUZ0a//lklMK2o=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:dd5c:: with SMTP id u89-v6mr4471399lfg.83.1532712004791; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a2e:3a13:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1807271000040.61865@ary.qy>
References: <CAD2i3WOZmFxSdmKZ6MEzNspcQt9JK8mKSv3zj83as3DPydVPGg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1807261936130.59294@ary.qy> <CABuGu1r1gg__JY37mwTbGdTFcOjvFC5gUowX5+jpppBN=sRsag@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1807271000040.61865@ary.qy>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:20:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbPAfoNTp-__HV3V-RQggUZY_TmdjBRzeg=ECGK0STuhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000096b17b0571fe5218"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/c6v0nfRUGecV00pIjoNuY29b4qI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:20:09 -0000

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 7:03 AM, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:

>
> Ah.  I still think it should go, but if you really want to do that, invent
> a new enhanced status code.  They're cheap.  5.7.7 isn't right, it's more
> like corrupt S/MIME bodies.
>
>
I did a bunch of these (for DKIM and SPF at least) in RFC7372.  You could
clone the template from there.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email