IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Thu, 26 July 2018 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168D2131275 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F-kdLc1F5TsO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD9D3131269 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 27166 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2018 23:36:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=6a1b.5b5a5b05.k1807; bh=fxLndv7zBi9IQ9uZO+GUpvjX59oNwYd3zwDIuUZonvs=; b=vviAJ6f46XWIVHnXCHDq++yyAeoNTRiLkA0TmdCFOzUbthotck7KYcrqJOU0nABGJza0UjEL2NhqbSEEPv0gW0XF0TphhAvU/NhgxlTh6xsiBfCBtrkuhN0aomOnyqYiPg6/dbv3JrPF4ijwYo2KnIXBTi/dkB69Jciq+LDWAULGphoWhMWdAlbGH/IzZn7VBR1VxpP70fsIL4AaCMK+A4gWDIh6D+Zz/KmhoCWrIt4mWOM5JRZCVOUhQtiCtpfA
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 26 Jul 2018 23:36:37 -0000
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:36:36 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1807261936130.59294@ary.qy>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2i3WOZmFxSdmKZ6MEzNspcQt9JK8mKSv3zj83as3DPydVPGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD2i3WOZmFxSdmKZ6MEzNspcQt9JK8mKSv3zj83as3DPydVPGg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/t7tJLBfaHkNvVNtAOSABJWgYRAs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 23:36:42 -0000

I agree, this is out of place.  Whether you reject at SMTP time is a much 
broader topic than ARC failures.

On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Seth Blank wrote:

> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16#section-5.2.2
>
> I am confused as to where this section comes from. It was never discussed
> on list, and I believe it should be stricken.
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/?q=5.7.7 has no results
> except for Dave Crocker's document evaluations with comments on the full
> text.
>
> At IETF99 and on the list, there was a conversation around handling
> tempfails, where the consensus was that we couldn't handle them. That
> resulted in the "all failures are permanent" section of the document.
> However, other text for handling tempfails showed up, was discussed, and
> then removed (
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/DmRu-_P-ZtfSjA1k6KUe-Zk0ACY).
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email