IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken

Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com> Wed, 25 July 2018 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@sethblank.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D63B12F1A6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3TXX755LLkmn for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B651277C8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id s198-v6so16584418oih.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=n7X5CQF22913m9ovhLGUfZaUTyvJBdR3trS3AHAFBXY=; b=M/MtsBqPk+C3MFO8O3mFoT4k9tQi+6ckEu8j3jETwwXfelC9BnLbsZ0jCdgHue/W+e IRRzAy9v8QJPqWPpanVXfD7tgQfoTQlgXmD+KlQD6ZR0iali8nYYAbrHJszO2Cb+IAbW RQUBZsfb9hQzOZoMrQmKzYGyafc0EDPLrhu1QUMZQYx/+wuzmLTRRqrJjEqDeSXfZlN3 hKuY3GcUo50iWhoTGZGHyBVARIAJm6KcGAbuxdXOKd8lG5bTl5qpqcWabR146s2z7IiX 3hsY9TtxdFZ9DxtsQ9BH4iCC3neoclfWAya5N1+gP7keVP5E919l7+Z1kI/fTXGZzff6 7qyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=n7X5CQF22913m9ovhLGUfZaUTyvJBdR3trS3AHAFBXY=; b=k5odu6vnmYTMnXT1D3b8WA7YjPu6GgZsDlLx42aeO0hTMvKA2scEu+eLv0Ifc8qkJy uJFiN/hD78cQVlnTQCTrDm1jo8m58zIa90yEi5Fn4L6qbEvGWlolDWKoyRhVLRdaFl/c iWSQ+z5np9JzKM6ZkPXxHWjEcU/dAMPrEm0CWsFDFUst7juUUtKCfXWUui38ssKls6yE Bl9JxjjWvdN/JpLPpylhDUiAgVRrvLVpgf0ZV+RU7s84808sD+jmKhZaIHHEr7rFCQ/p nx0GObMqg2q6AUbKNbSYjw2MVtWmvUWkhnYBq/fCsDpHoL0++HjNO1UIEuU8qgGj/nH7 5Vqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFf2Yv7cam3B4yWUUxzgQZ0r545FFe3qISHX/GYsCfvuUeWHEUe IjvlMFSuZ2h0rCN+4bDODL89YlQ9it9sdqb8wjJ/bO9g7OGPBQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdLx+mrkf/mfHOwgM2dXOxnyGCt7ZhaSQskwjiOjd8cx64vKc+amE5MZTS5DzBqkqda4ZKCJQdhJiJuZG2ANgs=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:b355:: with SMTP id c82-v6mr5563723oif.9.1532555224561; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:2646:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:46:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD2i3WOZmFxSdmKZ6MEzNspcQt9JK8mKSv3zj83as3DPydVPGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c24fa50571d9d186"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/uJls75ej1YNG1K7afqhfF95T3Fg>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 section 5.2.2 should be stricken
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 21:47:08 -0000

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16#section-5.2.2

I am confused as to where this section comes from. It was never discussed
on list, and I believe it should be stricken.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/?q=5.7.7 has no results
except for Dave Crocker's document evaluations with comments on the full
text.

At IETF99 and on the list, there was a conversation around handling
tempfails, where the consensus was that we couldn't handle them. That
resulted in the "all failures are permanent" section of the document.
However, other text for handling tempfails showed up, was discussed, and
then removed (
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/DmRu-_P-ZtfSjA1k6KUe-Zk0ACY).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email