Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists
Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> Sat, 09 October 2021 19:39 UTC
Return-Path: <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EA73A084F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9qt2zHNQLYeJ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 525943A0846 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com with SMTP id s4-20020a4aad44000000b002b6aa5b6999so2414900oon.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PsS11SJ81QrxCo3ZPLyYOSIQR7D7Et1R3fQMTjkrhHE=; b=V3B3CpLT0d0A0C7Oqsbv30NIE6QTMDaNX2uzgzbvNQ61gDoGM9ruEfZFM6NbgOnfh/ Cx9ze0CI+UQ0YT+k0ccN6WuF+K4Vfz13lrx8EO7I98nXntUKs6ZJft2EowwUdmKiE5g9 lpjSKGMl5C3YvsrJ40H83guKawsOT4CNUjns9kxl/4Cg2KrC/r4QyYMqIg0D9Wfd+NDx 5sWvCXdsdISVWr0972wWmOrV6118remikCEw8pcj+KN+E7jIdmgFHy/jVIQ/kAZlkNYY G0eCUY9mcGueF/OWfW1Hqv4T6/a3AgxOpbblUXiXU0zeCrpzL5YPnyOjxOC0lotuJT/X IkQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PsS11SJ81QrxCo3ZPLyYOSIQR7D7Et1R3fQMTjkrhHE=; b=hQpelMFZZRVFlKvfF/dKQuxc3nQZkne8i/1LlTaPutpy5RiMmPW12exw43NspjKKsr dPgF+vr2uTSs4JxE25BywU5vpQBvgg8pcqQhXDaAbX7PK7KlCJ0P3l6R6of2nzyGD4JQ S/ddZu2FHejeJiCEk7qgnLAjkIvEFvndOjwPsASjEZdJ0cFRyOx8Uh97enW55FOJq0nj +E8yfemDHGK0kDgYuO5C2+Z6L1pA77dBySrs+OuM29kN+cs3mmcwz+GBB0DqQB2VJEPW b4/IbPvFdl5AeLZFvI0VMvk0JtmH25EpQig1TJvJwawh0EhUWTpK7tVHLfWVNSqqp+K1 rAcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qN1XU1B1KBWPWRqouf3DamDR9IpYdc/j+Ki9dVCbm6hAGwrli +4/hgMKbwIqA23RGLyaCmWXEd9k0fQ3xCLbwsxg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfQy/+As6qbGlaG8kkhJu9HBJN+FbYNqo7R04RKbIsAfiVWef/kMWgtTlpmjkYCsLzG3xYhB2wP+Y+Z8FRAn0=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:c18d:: with SMTP id w13mr13121925oop.15.1633808387317; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211006233727.24C1429DC897@ary.qy> <56B7A1D4-B683-47D3-8871-2A1F283FA464@wordtothewise.com> <c1e199f1-0c91-9c39-1479-e9ba76af493e@tana.it> <2290129.80B3yH0EHm@zini-1880> <CALaySJJ3Neo6hgEJJ80g-H4vFMJ5Y-Fc=to4R8=sa9-3pg3zgg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJ3Neo6hgEJJ80g-H4vFMJ5Y-Fc=to4R8=sa9-3pg3zgg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 15:39:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CAH48Zfw81292FOXoSK9xDpG-zo9-r58Dne4Uwy+oi1SFSN_0pA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008ea2d205cdf0a882"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/7qZdbMbM1zdexGeZouUHWp_J0e0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 19:39:53 -0000
I would be pleased to see a document which explains why lists MUST or SHOULD alter content. After more than 2 years following this discussion, no reason for this practice has ever been documented. Content changes would be easier to justify if subscribers granted authorization to modify as part of the subscription process. But there was not informed consent when I joined this list, so I doubt that informed consent occurs on other lists either. What if, after reviewing the SHOULD list, an organization says "That's interesting but unconvincing. Please send messages to our domain without alteration?" Are lists equipped to give participants what they want, or not? Doug On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:58 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > Just on one point, for us to consider: > > > Personally, I think mailing lists changing From has horrible UX and I > don't > > really think anyone disagrees. It's only advantages are that it's > relatively > > easy to implement in a Mailing List Manager (MLM) and it solves the > entire > > DMARC problem for a specific mailing list without needing anyone else to > change > > anything. I understand the appeal. > > I think Scott is right that we all agree that rewriting From mitigates > problems that mailing lists have with DMARC, but at a significant cost > in usability. > > I think it would be bad to publish From-rewriting as a standard. > > But here: I think it is reasonable, perhaps advisable, to > informationally document From-rewriting as a mechanism that is in use, > and to include in that documentation a clear exposition of the > problems that it causes. Why not get those horrible UX issues down on > paper so that when someone decides to deploy it they are better > informed? Perhaps we can lead people to take steps to reduce the UX > challenges (for example, rewriting the way the IETF is doing it at > least addresses the issue of knowing who sent the message, and how to > reply to the actual sender, as compared to a rewrite directly to the > mailing list address). > > Doesn't that make sense? > > Barry > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
- [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Baptiste Carvello
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Baptiste Carvello
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Baptiste Carvello
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Definitely Alessandro Vesely no question
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] bad senders, was DMARC-Compliant… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Oh, the mail, it is a-changin', … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Oh, the mail, it is a-changin', … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Oh, the mail, it is a-changin', … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Oh, the mail, it is a-changin', … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Oh, the mail, it is a-changin', … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Grant Taylor
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists John, come on
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Baptiste Carvello
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Joseph Brennan
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Grant Taylor
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Baptiste Carvello
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Baptiste Carvello
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists Alessandro Vesely