IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 07 October 2021 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352503A08B1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6qNPJcFr06V for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95B3B3A08AE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id d18so7141978vsh.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9yp8XvnBwMztFlrbyKt5NhHgYjmh/bzurj8pVSILfgs=; b=kF1h2E9pNufAGwwm1QWPk0xle/3yS8s0W9jwRoztwI+nzzfRmSyVRyVrIrewG59FIE BH1pxxXlTXuTgwGhMXmCgizddU4t2svHjdjCm36ck6Iy0E4HNPK55oKH5vZHYmkswks3 VEJKlTmkXFwusn2d3uOEXLcZMVTeWZQkgTJzecKsAiCmiXoTqXyhTtrt3E400c6tg5ye pB8Oc8Ux3DA3qE0p5p/GN/1MfZXFrpkA3hFOIXLQ7Wsf4FGJ3cHakktw5/6Nxj0i45pk culdYt5FH7edobKBiKrjP1w7ygAXZbhheE/xWOJWwUddAj3rCkNBKed5mC3eWBvrrzZw inWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9yp8XvnBwMztFlrbyKt5NhHgYjmh/bzurj8pVSILfgs=; b=eauyhNBcMh+CwAVHJVSEUhH3o7dmlYOaRHCZMICf9pbU8I+vptSnrOW6WEVekOgmRV QAVrekM2oud3RimLUgy2aOaSoiObTFL7oPDY3tT4GpGdweGkbYqqIIXccMiW3ApE8IYq wQvFmFmQSYebKr9kEhVtuB6gDmkAzTPyS5D+tJ1HxmeGyvFwLc1dn0HRrSWbRX1Ps2+g +xYupdIR8mpcvtcBIzSDE3RdmnlAr4EFjpx0o7D5EWjSs1mR+UxduXoaiOxFibtW9uCA iIUVz/p3TviY1m2Ec2oHgYUfZIdsjs3T+mEsge2oq461jNljipiC49WeLFGLMfNoXq8e tU8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313aH6hf7e4/f3Cwnsbr+r6nuZ5XKprC+S/FUgyiVUn1Z9RXqLe IWDmPV3tzkA3pXmO1iqYC6msZrH+H14P+SIVl/4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUO8kT5RPK90aUSTInlBSyM0NpRJmRZyhnqSxsEUXLlcm1MsGOIe5wykU2TUDfyNOBXySISawfXry27IOeb4s=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ab04:: with SMTP id u4mr4531965vse.12.1633619505519; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211006233727.24C1429DC897@ary.qy> <56B7A1D4-B683-47D3-8871-2A1F283FA464@wordtothewise.com> <c1e199f1-0c91-9c39-1479-e9ba76af493e@tana.it> <2290129.80B3yH0EHm@zini-1880> <CALaySJJ3Neo6hgEJJ80g-H4vFMJ5Y-Fc=to4R8=sa9-3pg3zgg@mail.gmail.com> <2e060d65-3159-de90-5097-3f1fd4b0494e@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e060d65-3159-de90-5097-3f1fd4b0494e@gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:11:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwY0WnOXA3586zLRWv9qQrmjnyr1P11hroRs=w=YXmrvvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000531f4405cdc4aed4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/CJvzEhrDaPSXxZZjBoJg6D57tT0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 15:11:49 -0000

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 7:57 AM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, but I've lost track of which document would informationally
> document this issue.
>
> The re-writing hack is an operational one that might or might not prove
> the be transient. Having a spec note the effect of what it does, in
> terms of rendering mailing use problematic, is reasonable.
>
> Having a spec go into details about the hack of the moment isn't.  On
> the other hand, it's reasonable to put such discussion into a companion
> 'usage' doc, IMO.
>

He didn't specify, but I took the suggestion to mean a new document, not
any of the current ones.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email