IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 20 July 2021 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CFD3A308A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.638
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.638 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wvuw3urOG0HR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com [209.85.208.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928943A3086 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id h4so18457ljo.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lVei4KoS9tNAE9hi80XeLaw8Y0ntDMo+P3s3nrGFjMA=; b=lPz9BP8I1zFz+oWqiheGzuyBE0qJ3fq3KW/bHNPHLavkkHAsvfl/pT/XltAD3r+Jzl dNk+heVOUlCORQsepbsK6GcDUIHSNrHudjDmWfBACpit21112sNdrqpdqQzmMyjgRZTh C8FdvmddfZEIgCgMYC4mR8y9pf43/iAJmULssq0uHdfmEfWI1NIRatWRdU6OVpiSwZ8r LFfFOfV/0wnZSHiqzDlhZfVFDcoKUl7ylxiK0Db2sx1x6teeodYcwkUkU6nURWfSzr2p eY/utVYorb1KFDZh31QmeKGUdFimiUlH+6DY+M36OD6HqYgNwzT/JItatI9vGz2NfZBN tnMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zZyeXyCcafK3jmtqIA0VUs+xtBfXJFdALL9VPZyCXCiOuxWOH N0dKxqIF4CHbANyn74dbtXXTYimsEdn1/03CwVo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCA13iXuFvcNehKfql+0Sij6QLv+s7rBZrhFmPP/VwYKG4zxIEqiWRT/1EDL07kUWf1logQFtdFFO5HhY8Dnk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8956:: with SMTP id b22mr22756245ljk.248.1626811998415; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHej_8=yvgXP2WgHayhGU2Hg2E0RcNgZBFjfw1cM-qKWkTG-+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48Zfys9cwTskjjdeJ14Y-wDBuqLseDEEiNvwC9BonLAwMyVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8mTF7DFwDiCHBq_mK40E+vuFS6iB+MQ3Co3pS=ZdqXkcg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfwUAfwG93ZOoFp+Xbor-chZ-X0Pbd9OGdAs3mxsTFHxEw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJwS=OvWZypbfTHsdjSLeMNFaq5TM7De0MrQO32fz-cHg@mail.gmail.com> <99d648e3-9f72-393a-a16e-225e340a8152@gmail.com> <CAJ4XoYf0mE_1kY06J5Tuw3G5JySndqRPyu96uJjdWEWXgE0S+g@mail.gmail.com> <52d3b7d214499c20a490baa4c43a998d@junc.eu>
In-Reply-To: <52d3b7d214499c20a490baa4c43a998d@junc.eu>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:13:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJJ-Nsi_hg=g1T6AdtAXEfnW-mHavLfb=5ppxbgRtVkVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/LzUx94VPny868j4w924liT8Y2FI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:13:26 -0000

One of the points of "deprecation" is that we don't eliminate it
entirely, but say that it's no longer used.  New implementations no
longer generate it, but implementations that are interested in
backward compatibility will still include support for it on receipt.

Eventually, when we see that its use is rare enough, the community
might move to no longer include support (no longer needing backward
compatibility).  But I expect that support on receipt would remain for
some time.

Barry

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 2:52 PM Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu> wrote:
>
> On 2021-07-20 19:16, Dotzero wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:39 PM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On 7/20/2021 7:54 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> >>> I would like to see us deprecate PCT entirely,
> >> +1
> > +1
>
> if this was postfix it would not be accepted, old habist must stay to be
> backward compatible, sadly not all understand why
>
> with all that changes it could end with no one uses this good software
> writed after c code i provided :(
>
> hope for there LTS of it all
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email