Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"
"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Sat, 07 July 2018 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940A7130EA5 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 12:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ziytd-M-cofs for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 12:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19B68130E6D for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 12:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18064; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1530993290; x=1532202890; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=E2WcQYq2bkYpikwts5Fjzug7lHGvmtOldjJSQ/El9Sc=; b=ipDvP9tUHrs2+NiTbGj01N0WNrtYK2uucPVVcFnih5Au61we2yUpAihV vRN9EF5QxU5Ysj2t5p5z3x7e2Rr+hFxZ1jvcz/V/6vgTpPmEALV4D8vLp QoLw7VwqaToMBwQa1rUkkBanOIVrUiMy2S44RVIUgVSSKceoYlF1tZ+5p o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D9AQB4GUFb/5tdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNJYn8oCoNwiASMNIIHgziEfox8gXoLJYRHAheCFiE0GAECAQECAQECbRwMhTYBAQEBAyMROgYRBAIBCBEBAgEBAQECAiMDAgICHxEUAQIGCAIEARIbgwaBZwMVD6lPghyEW4IwDYEugTUFgQuHY4FWP4EOAYMPgUGBFUIEGIFGBx8SAoJHglUCh0aKJIc6KwkChgZzhR5vghyBQoQOiA2HfYI7T4ZiAhETAYEkHTiBUnAVGiGCaYIwHIM0ilJvAQGNUweBJ4EaAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,322,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="417408944"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2018 19:54:48 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com (xch-aln-009.cisco.com [173.36.7.19]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w67JsmtT002624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 7 Jul 2018 19:54:48 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 14:54:47 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 14:54:47 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "Bogineni, Kalyani" <Kalyani.Bogineni@VerizonWireless.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"
Thread-Index: AQHUFixbBV6/ueHd4E6net/XdqSVyw==
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 19:54:47 +0000
Message-ID: <D76667E4.2BD254%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <D7664D24.2BD242%sgundave@cisco.com> <73d4a20e761a4fdeb30493bd2f950438@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
In-Reply-To: <73d4a20e761a4fdeb30493bd2f950438@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.7.170905
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.20.188.62]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BC7AC618C5256544A0B52CE4AEFD8C3D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/nWFQ-zuoPALQqoKrJhl2I6i-s24>
Subject: Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 19:54:54 -0000
Hi Kalyani, Thanks for the feedback. Looking at the LS, I see the deadline as July 20th. Is that a mistake? Unfortunately, we were going by the date listed in the LS. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_l iaison_1572_&d=DwIFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiSO Dh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=DpwNaCrfXd9EI fo9xBxDQO1_hSmvZiI6uiV6fYe3rYU&s=4575vR5rygFrP_tvoH2z0iDv1njzued0M1dNS0wbTT s&e= Deadline: 2018-07-20 Action Needed I do not know if we will be able to close this by 8th July. Sri On 7/7/18, 12:18 PM, "Bogineni, Kalyani" <Kalyani.Bogineni@VerizonWireless.com> wrote: >Sri: > >The LS response is fine as it reflects the status of the work in IETF. > >I am not sure when you plan to send the LS response since you requested >feedback by July 13th. > >FYI, The next CT4 meeting is from July 9-13th as seen from the attached >meeting Invitation. > >Attached is the meeting agenda - Input LSs will be processed on Monday >July 9th from 9:00 - 11:30 AM. > >Regards, >Kalyani > > >-----Original Message----- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >(sgundave) >Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2018 2:00 PM >To: Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com>; dmm@ietf.org >Subject: [E] Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item >on User Plane Protocol in 5GC" > >Folks - Here is the response in pending state. We are holding for WG >feedback. > >If you have any objections too this, please let us know by 13th of July, >2018. > >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_ >liaison_1586_&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=Idi >SODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=qxXTZYI7pM >D_45zlLf4jtPJrGH6H0ygd_lgk8PE1o24&s=77-_DB88Sb27VyXuBt7_1OKS1QMBOTs_A_Ln-p >GFsYc&e= > > >Sri > > > > > >On 7/6/18, 11:25 PM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" ><dmm-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of sgundave=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> >wrote: > >>Hi Arashmid, >> >>Thanks for the feedback. >> >>I have added a link to the DMM WG pages and it has links to all the DMM >>documents. I think that should be OK, we don’t have to explicitly list >>out every single I-D at this stage. As we move forward and based on WG >>discussions/progress, we can provide more detailed feedback on each >>document. I suggest we keep this simple for now. >> >> >> >>> So, what happens next? We wait for their reply? >> >>This is just a response to the LS; more an information exchange on the >>status/progress. >> >> >> >>Regards >>Sri >> >> >> >> >>On 7/6/18, 1:56 PM, "Arashmid Akhavain" <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Hi Sri, >>> >>>We might also want to add draft-camarillo-dmm-srv6-mobile-pocs-00 >>>under "Related Documents". >>> >>>Also, we might want to say something like: >>>"Although we will NOT pick a particular approach, we will be ready to >>>provide further assistance to 3GPP regarding the technical details of >>>different candidates." >>> >>>So, what happens next? We wait for their reply? >>> >>>Cheers, >>>Arashmid >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >>>> (sgundave) >>>> Sent: 06 July 2018 13:49 >>>> To: dmm@ietf.org >>>> Subject: Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item >>>> on User Plane Protocol in 5GC" >>>> >>>> We plan to send the following response to 3GPP CT4. If you have any >>>>quick comments/corrections/suggestions, please let us know in a day. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ³ >>>> Thank you for your Liaison request (Reference: CP-173160) and for >>>>sharing the information on the status of the CT4 study item on >>>>user-plane protocol for 5GC. The IETF DMM working group wants to >>>>acknowledge your request and want to share the following update. >>>> >>>> IETF DMM working is currently reviewing various proposals on >>>>approaches for realizing optimizations in user-plane for mobile >>>>packet core. These proposals include protocol specifications based >>>>on new/existing protocols and proposals covering >>>>requirements/analysis/comparison of various approaches. At this >>>>point of time, some of these documents are working group documents >>>>and some are individual submissions and yet to be adopted as working >>>>group documents. Based on the working group interest, feedback >>>>charter-scope, the working group may choose to adopt some of these >>>>work items as working group documents and at that time will seek >>>>feedback from 3GPP. >>>> >>>> We also would like to state that the DMM working group will not be >>>>in a position to pick a single approach/solution as THE approach for >>>>user-plane optimization. Most likely the working group may >>>>standardize more than one approach, but will characterize each of >>>>these approaches based on its technical capabilities and >>>>limitations. This approach would be consistent with the approach >>>>that IETF took with IPv6 transitioning work, where IETF standardized >>>>multiple approaches including DSLite, NAT64, Gi-DSLite and other >>>>approaches. >>>> >>>> Finally, IETF would like to point 3GPP to the following documents >>>> under consideration. >>>> >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ietf.org_id_ >>>> draft-2Dbogineni-2Ddmm-2Doptimized-2Dmobile-2Duser-2Dplane-2D&d=DwIG >>>> aQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGg >>>> d9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=qxXTZYI7pMD_45zlLf >>>> 4jtPJrGH6H0ygd_lgk8PE1o24&s=PZVdEP1rEzF40-JWBzGaYGXXFIA-J6E8VNrtCU-L >>>> Xeo&e= >>>> 01.tx >>>> t (Individual submission) >>>> >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_in >>>> ternet-2Ddrafts_draft-2Dhmm-2Ddmm-2D5g-2Duplane-2Danalysis-2D&d=DwIG >>>> aQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGg >>>> d9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=qxXTZYI7pMD_45zlLf >>>> 4jtPJrGH6H0ygd_lgk8PE1o24&s=RFXqAJd7ktCOVPOxjgWrfpkrKG_wABrZA2gvpH6P >>>> 22Y&e= >>>> 00.tx >>>> t (Individual submission) >>>> >>>> >>>> Related Documents: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_id_ >>>>draft-2Dietf-2Ddmm-2Dsrv6-2Dmobile-2Duplane-2D02.txt&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTR >>>>vFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKg >>>>Kcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=qxXTZYI7pMD_45zlLf4jtPJrGH6H0y >>>>gd_lgk8PE1o24&s=PSzx-NfxacXnnIu0yifXWiDz7-t6PqPY-paV4DNwxOw&e= >>>>(Working >>>> group document) >>>> >>>> >>>> Link to DMM Pages: >>>> >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.iet >>>> f.org_wg_dmm_documents_&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb >>>> 6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYE >>>> TcBynUdpT&m=qxXTZYI7pMD_45zlLf4jtPJrGH6H0ygd_lgk8PE1o24&s=f3434N55x1 >>>> rC9NVSdFiUTjzhwsBJPkdtpy8a_vIRVcQ&e= >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please let us know if you need any additional information. >>>> " >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/11/18, 11:16 AM, "Liaison Statement Management Tool" >>>> <lsmt@ietf.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >Title: CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC >>>> >Submission Date: 2018-04-11 URL of the IETF Web page: >>>> >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ie >>>> >tf.org_liaison_1572_&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6_ >>>> >_0PomBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYET >>>> >cBynUdpT&m=qxXTZYI7pMD_45zlLf4jtPJrGH6H0ygd_lgk8PE1o24&s=Y5tfX_Bnem >>>> >dhocQwO2YoxurotS34WWP7G_RHmWTrl-4&e= >>>> >Please reply by 2018-07-20 >>>> >From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp> >>>> >To: Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>,Dapeng Liu >>>> ><maxpassion@gmail.com> >>>> >Cc: Dapeng Liu <maxpassion@gmail.com>,Terry Manderson >>>> ><terry.manderson@icann.org>,Distributed Mobility Management >>>> Discussion >>>> >List <dmm@ietf.org>,Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>,Suresh >>>> Krishnan >>>> ><suresh@kaloom.com> Response Contacts: >>>> >georg.mayer.huawei@gmx.com,3GPPLiaison@etsi.org >>>> >Technical Contacts: >>>> >Purpose: For action >>>> > >>>> >Body: 1. Overall Description: >>>> >3GPP working group of CT4 (Core and Terminal) would like to inform >>>> >the IETF that CT4 has initiated a study item on user plane protocol >>>> >in 5GC for Release-16 of 5G phase 2 (see CP-173160). >>>> > >>>> >Based on the outcome from the IETF / 3GPP Coordination meeting at >>>> >IETF#100, 3GPP CT4 got aware that IETF DMM WG is currently working >>>> >on >>>>a >>>> >possible candidate protocol for the 3GPP 5G user plane protocol. >>>> > >>>> >3GPP CT4 wants to emphasize that currently there is no related >>>> >evaluation ongoing in 3GPP. Nevertheless, a study item was approved >>>>for >>>> >such a study to start in the second half of 2018. The study will >>>> >evaluate between existing solutions within 3GPP and other >>>> >protocols, based on the Release >>>> >16 stage 2 (system architecture) requirements. >>>> > >>>> >3GPP CT4 would like to point IETF DMM to the following >>>> >specifications on GTP-U. The Release 16 stage 2 requirements are >>>> >not yet known but it is worth looking at latest GTP-U spec which >>>> >will be evaluated through the study as the existing protocol. >>>> > >>>> >€ [1] 3GPP TS 29.281 (V15.1.0): GPRS Tunnelling Protocol User Plane >>>> >(GTPv1-U) >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >Following technical report provides information of how 3GPP >>>> >considered GTP-U apply to user plane of 5G_ph1: >>>> > >>>> >€ [2] 3GPP TR 29.891 (V15.0.0): 5G System Phase 1; CT4 Aspects >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >Furthermore, 3GPP would like to give the following general guidance >>>> >to IETF DMM, regarding user plane transport within 3GPP networks. >>>> >These are technical specifications that include also the necessary >>>> >information to understand which architectural, QoS, >>>> >security-related and high-level requirements GTP-U currently >>>>complies to within 5G_ph1. >>>> > >>>> >€ [3] 3GPP TS 23.501 (V15.0.0): System Architecture for the 5G System >>>> >€ [4] 3GPP TS 23.502 (V15.0.0): Procedures for the 5G System >>>> >€ [5] 3GPP TS 23.503 (V15.0.0): Policy and Charging Framework for the >>>> 5G >>>> >System >>>> >€ [6] 3GPP TS 33.501 (V0.6.0): Security Architecture (work in >>>>progress) >>>> > >>>> >2. Actions: >>>> >To IETF DMM: >>>> >ACTION: CT4 respectfully asks IETF DMM to provide any information >>>> that >>>> >may be relevant to the above CT4 work by July 2018. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >3. Date of Next CT and CT4 Meetings: >>>> >CT4#83 26th Feb 2nd Mar 2018 Montreal, CAN >>>> >CT#79 19th 20th Mar 2018 Chennai, India >>>> >CT4#84 16th 20th April 2018 Kunming, China >>>> >CT4#85 21st 25th May 2018 Osaka, Japan >>>> >CT#80 11th 12th June 2018 La Jolla, USA >>>> >CT4#85-bis 9th 13th July 2018 TBD, France >>>> >CT4#86 20st 24th Aug 2018 TBD, USA >>>> >Attachments: >>>> > >>>> > CP-180116 >>>> > >>>> >>>>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_li >>>>>b_dt_documents_LIAISON_liaison-2D2018-2D04-2D11-2D3gpp-2Dt&d=DwIGaQ& >>>>>c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9M >>>>>znLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=qxXTZYI7pMD_45zlLf4jt >>>>>PJrGH6H0ygd_lgk8PE1o24&s=eFXZksriT8I7oyQ2VdYY02soc1SdM7QLI7EJK4O8mdU >>>>>&e= >>>> >sgc >>>> >>>>>t-ct4-dmm-cp-173160-new-study-item-on-user-plane-protocol-in-5gc-att >>>>>ach >>>> >men >>>> >t-1.doc >>>> > >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dmm mailing list >>>> dmm@ietf.org >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_ma >>>> ilman_listinfo_dmm&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0P >>>> omBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcByn >>>> UdpT&m=qxXTZYI7pMD_45zlLf4jtPJrGH6H0ygd_lgk8PE1o24&s=YrIr5CHJMjB2j4e >>>> bFkCLy_9NwWmV0lQpHiSgLUeFJTI&e= >> >>_______________________________________________ >>dmm mailing list >>dmm@ietf.org >>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailm >>an_listinfo_dmm&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ& >>r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=qx >>XTZYI7pMD_45zlLf4jtPJrGH6H0ygd_lgk8PE1o24&s=YrIr5CHJMjB2j4ebFkCLy_9NwWm >>V0lQpHiSgLUeFJTI&e= > >_______________________________________________ >dmm mailing list >dmm@ietf.org >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_ >listinfo_dmm&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiS >ODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=qxXTZYI7pMD >_45zlLf4jtPJrGH6H0ygd_lgk8PE1o24&s=YrIr5CHJMjB2j4ebFkCLy_9NwWmV0lQpHiSgLUe >FJTI&e=
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Bogineni, Kalyani
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Bogineni, Kalyani
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Bogineni, Kalyani
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Stud… Liaison Statement Management Tool
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Bogineni, Kalyani
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Charlie Perkins
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Uma Chunduri
- Re: [DMM] [E] Re: New Liaison Statement, "CP-1731… Bogineni, Kalyani
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Bogineni, Kalyani
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Bogineni, Kalyani
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Luca Muscariello
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Jordan Augé
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Giovanna Carofiglio (gcarofig)
- Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New … Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)