IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2-00.txt]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 19 July 2016 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F4D12DB9F for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4sH0SvD_E8Nf for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCDBD12DCA3 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 085CC28018B; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:18:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036C8280165; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:18:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACDB4C0032; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:18:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:18:03 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Message-ID: <20160719151803.GA21941@nic.fr>
References: <20160718202546.GA6329@sources.org> <CA+nkc8DsBDxw--mL-PqOXeQ0rS2ui5wOdJ6fqwFSm3OsnrQkkw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8DsBDxw--mL-PqOXeQ0rS2ui5wOdJ6fqwFSm3OsnrQkkw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux stretch/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-686-pae i686
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/5iuNpseHFcnAavpLE0HVgVkeQ_I>
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:35:13 -0000

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:11:18AM -0400,
 Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> wrote 
 a message of 130 lines which said:

> I would think that "Key in DNS, authenticated by DNSSEC" would be
> the obvious choice.

It is mentioned, section 2.2.

For the -00 version, I did not try to order ("obvious" or "best") the
choices. Feedback welcomed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email