IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2-00.txt]

Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws> Tue, 19 July 2016 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <edmonds@mycre.ws>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48E3127058 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QMNpD4DXZceP for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mycre.ws (mycre.ws [45.33.102.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9C212D80A for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by chase.mycre.ws (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 20B1612C0F18; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:07:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:07:29 -0400
From: Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Message-ID: <20160719160729.GA29531@mycre.ws>
References: <20160718202546.GA6329@sources.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20160718202546.GA6329@sources.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/iatSmEZUYOtXzs08RY-nDsA6JFU>
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:12:52 -0000

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Isn't it time we start working on the resolver-to-auth link?
> 
> I know that DPRIVE does not meet in Berlin but, if people who are
> there (I'm not) want to discuss it, I'll be interested in feedbacks,
> flames and pull requests.

Why port 953? I thought the registration for the “domain-s” port was
853?

Note that there is at least one DNS server that defaults to listening on
TCP port 953 for its control socket. When I reported the lack of an IANA
port registration to the vendor (ISC-Bugs #41202) I was told there was
no need to register a port for a “private use” protocol.

-- 
Robert Edmonds

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email