Re: [dns-privacy] [[e-mail]: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2-00.txt]

[Shane Kerr <[e-mail]>]

Terry,

I think it's weird that we have people who have ideas about needed
standardization work, and we insist that they work outside of a
chartered working group.

I tend to think that recursive-to-authority privacy work should be done
in dprive, but if that working group needs to wait for the standards
they have developed to "bake", then okay. We should work towards a BoF
for a new working group then, right?

Cheers,

--
Shane

At 2016-07-19 07:27:13 +0000
Terry Manderson <[e-mail]> wrote:
 
> Thanks for starting to enumerate the options/problems related to recursive
> resolver to authoritative name server.
> 
> As AD, I would very much like to see some operational data points and some
> experience from 'the wild' of deployment to better inform a (re)charter
> discussion.
> 
> That said, I am VERY interested to see individuals start work (as you have
> done) and continue to work in parallel with the above goals.
> 
> Cheers
> Terry
> 
> On 19/07/2016, 6:25 AM, "dns-privacy on behalf of Stephane Bortzmeyer"
> <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> >Isn't it time we start working on the resolver-to-auth link?
> >
> >I know that DPRIVE does not meet in Berlin but, if people who are
> >there (I'm not) want to discuss it, I'll be interested in feedbacks,
> >flames and pull requests.
> >