IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2-00.txt]

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Tue, 19 July 2016 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D792C12DA63 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id exD5r44EGFpr for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x229.google.com (mail-yw0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8337412DEE1 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x229.google.com with SMTP id i12so19224675ywa.1 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xQca5N5cHZlFWkw1eaPTia5ZNMaFwfQyv83hiiOU7LE=; b=Wl2b7dOPjpU9NlN3hr7MpTFAc/SGB2HzaCuf9/WvhymyL3ctLlegj6tzK/EbQx255T CzDlqkkSbz+F6i9vhgUEg2K0xOzKt1QQULOMyTrH0rjJ4TjVY2LoOqy1Bbk1UAB8PCVi GhCnLFN4JpuJbcduTyvRo6H/RKQhr+NFAcP8Lc5HeBoPnnOk1wxzLRI70kpc+4JYeVSd rCcmvNOuHhvEPhwPT+O5lWgj+EpkNYk2lcuaW2iO6jPWnzTFEA4Y+8u4kSOCaAHixoBQ ksGzeIUqtrFAVWuOUf8YKLKAdgQhErt6sQs7oX6208Vjr0OF41WaaeqRRTSDYD+O8kGW 2vKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xQca5N5cHZlFWkw1eaPTia5ZNMaFwfQyv83hiiOU7LE=; b=L9wfFKnFABri1DgnGF/mSK6G+AoEmgBVb/bFpLDCZYPNY8h0fOB0KD5jqLNRXmH5M3 tmnRt4uUNInNLEIMBA5xgXEtJh3LFOxCMTRjkedwTXCYhtgJB5LQ7aQyFlC/Taua1qPi yoEMZdHiNk+KS2lJc1xMJ4u8GIG2liUfOalXhwsLH9S7Q7WYkwUs33e5T4Ikdttcgraw +Xv815CIqwV8Eg5jzPgSgFnfWC7a7V3RcyQYicaQmihZS5Xujv+id1e5wehruioHXgf3 ljc3A0GmUn8L/YVEvRrRFGJDSr6r6TNfB+499dW09A/GpmRgL9pMEsLZ3WGo4hkpOUMg w7fg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIHViUKYHdFbmsTkq+oSVV7AUDLCVlLAmkXvEsRRKoFnvJ1Kxr1rii7TPpp321qywzeIIvfpv/UDW9Tyh+F
X-Received: by 10.37.57.147 with SMTP id g141mr18850026yba.163.1468942093320; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.91.198 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160719151803.GA21941@nic.fr>
References: <20160718202546.GA6329@sources.org> <CA+nkc8DsBDxw--mL-PqOXeQ0rS2ui5wOdJ6fqwFSm3OsnrQkkw@mail.gmail.com> <20160719151803.GA21941@nic.fr>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:28:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8CTpZumXUdbK=dEjDfsg87g2p-DSj9HUmC2T1XQx8p=8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114ecefaab38540537febb94"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/EITPYUKKvaD9KqMBRjBopbEDfQI>
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:43:02 -0000

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:11:18AM -0400,
>  Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> wrote
>  a message of 130 lines which said:
>
> > I would think that "Key in DNS, authenticated by DNSSEC" would be
> > the obvious choice.
>
> It is mentioned, section 2.2.
>
> For the -00 version, I did not try to order ("obvious" or "best") the
> choices. Feedback welcomed.
>

I was confused by the "bootstrap" issue, or why talk to port 953.  I was
assuming normal unencrypted DNSSEC to get the key, and then encrypt the
query that I wanted to protect.  I can see why some would want to try to
make private getting the key, if possible, but it really complicates
things, so I am not sure it is worth it.  (Just my opinion, of course.)

-- 
Bob Harold

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email