IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] New Version Notification for draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-02

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 19 August 2011 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE4221F8742 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.074
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.074 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76c-PntvaQ5p for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 52EAC21F8922 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 37416 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2011 07:51:37 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 19 Aug 2011 07:51:37 -0000
Message-ID: <4E4E1576.7020803@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:49:10 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>
References: <4DB81069.3080404@nic.cz> <4DF9B5BD.7010900@nic.cz> <a06240803ca1fd7525c50@10.31.201.23> <BANLkTinjRDHyKH-tLEoejodXb2+7qQLO7w@mail.gmail.com> <a06240801ca2102b8b4f2@10.31.201.23> <BANLkTikoVVaXF2_LJ3KHm6P7oFpfC+n2tw@mail.gmail.com> <a06240801ca21246f76de@10.31.201.23> <BANLkTinVfuL0WEYwaycTaAnWDS9vYF5NjQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DFC9C20.4030401@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <BANLkTimhLJfsmMe3AE34yLrOQ+zyZPBdgQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E000B93.3030306@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <8A34D894-4323-4948-811E-6568C838A503@nic.cz> <4E4D7E7E.1070700@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <80B25AE0-4DB6-4DBB-866B-4DB8F59D6DA0@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <80B25AE0-4DB6-4DBB-866B-4DB8F59D6DA0@nic.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] New Version Notification for draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-02
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:49:08 -0000

Ondej Sur wrote:

>> You fail to explain why the AXFR happens.
>>> And there's a lot of stuff which can happen
>>> on the master to forget the differences.

>> I can see none.

>  From an operational experience, I see a lot.  You can run out of memory,
> out of disk space, on disk journal can get corrupt (yes this happens),
> DNS software can (and will) have other bugs, people can make mistakes.
> Yes, all of this happens in the real world.

You are saying people can't properly operate a simple system.

Then, the solution can not be something to make the system more
complex.

 >> The simplest solution is not to forget the differences.
 > From the pure theoretical view point, yes.  From the operational view,

I'm talking from the operational view point.

 > The IXFR-only is a simple solution to remedy this problem.

It is not.

							Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email