Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt

[Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]>]

On 3/17/15 4:20 PM, Alec Muffett wrote:
>
> Before this discussion becomes derailed by discussion of the strategies of
> the contents of other proposals, I would like to round this discussion
> back to the matter of the draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt document:
>
> Christian’s response clearly distinguishes the separateness of Jake & my
> document "draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt” from his
> “draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names”.
>
> I believe this clearly answers the question that Paul Wouters raised in
> his first response.  The two are separate enterprises.
>
> In my previous e-mail I have outlined the goals of
> “draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt” and will happily address any
> further questions.
>
> May I please request approval to post to the list in order to respond to
> any further questions? I am a newbie to DNSOP and am unsure whether,
> having subscribed and responded to one submission confirmation, whether
> this means my future posts will be automatically approved.  I guess that
> I’m about to find out.
>
>      - alec
>
alec

By subscribing to the list, you've got approval to post, as long as you 
follow common sense, which is documented in the "Note Well" documents:

	http://www.ietf.org/list/


This whole discussion is actually useful, and the working group chairs 
(myself and Suzanne) just wrapped up a call with Joel (our amazingly 
wonderful Area Director for those following along at home) and while we 
will discuss these in Dallas, time is tight and we have a direction 
which we will share later today.

tim