Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt
hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org> Tue, 17 March 2015 05:01 UTC
Return-Path: <hellekin@gnu.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E98F1A007D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0LiR3_mFl4jb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E4071A0074 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ol168-138.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.138.168]:42896 helo=raiz.hellekin.gnu) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1YXjd7-0005LC-6E; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:01:25 -0400
Message-ID: <5507B50B.8000903@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 02:00:59 -0300
From: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Organization: https://gnu.org/consensus
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
References: <CAFggDF0XX3v7yGsaCwFnE7cjK0yz4-frxFgoBJfnztO8k-LFBg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503162052420.20709@bofh.nohats.ca> <55078791.50300@gnu.org> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503162219310.20709@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503162219310.20709@bofh.nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uCmeaql7vRl8Xo9VZ0QOQ5gR9IU>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:01:31 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/16/15 23:20, Paul Wouters wrote: > > It seems odd that two documents would be requesting an IANA action for > ".onion" ? > *** Well yes, it sounds like a mistake to me. But we can also consider it a god-given gift for people who argued against multiple TLDs in a single draft to remained focused on the actual objective(s) pursued by the draft(s). > > Than perhaps I completely misunderstood things? How does this relate to > DNS or DNSOP if it is about issuing SSL certificates only? > *** Sorry, but I'm not the author, so I can't answer that part. == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVB7UAXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9dbsP/1XXwwZPW3wWRNmFMJVqa3jy QGf3sPSmiJSsWoGMv0X5E3dQCcLn8c8Th58myYsOFJSKGhMTekhxgBySWCayscJG FSHFjwk++UTwRgO0vy/M9/oJbCjGdpOh/fegZrVeeOhR21/I9Q3kzBzd+QL9WdV4 uwowqKIHBpjUv3rk0JKIQFrAepm5YQJ4uoVF1cdq6q8nwT8G2mxl5t4gBvuiqW8Z IGHUaxnOnmFhr2HT/jnGWXD9ksY1Rk8cFifqGYLzToksPBsKCQwr4z1xwE/lAgP7 XwhISW96Zf6FbyiUFVMHpYoGhPGBd6Fz/e+NoThNccUzqx1/TaEg4WC0MuuhyXvs 8c75gVsKLf4rPUPoNTXkU18DU2kMqoO8b+KjuYSzAXQHRHlgbI3519To0OtjKerU /lYtdGJ3ylCZh8wOFGTV/J5+vUXL+L6S6haqmtPoOcSLFBQH0ziouwRywdS7v2YF X6Ir7esAgugQMwS/ZalJyexnEqu1M2AVcbXCu6pQ2J77pRnRDS2Dl5mg6NJPVjeS 5p+SnOYP+NfpUSHaZl3RtfIudXIwVTRUpsD9F5e21jKpPTniwp24si/ZfmZd/K/E 5pBCfXOoN5uIRqdO123rdTvUtSpO+jRrPhTUN7k53tsvip0pppbtRWQ7S/bYOuDd sMNliOkUv0Td6Q3r7vKc =QfoC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Cake
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Rubens Kuhl
- [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onio… Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Christian Grothoff
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Richard Barnes
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Cake
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Hugo Maxwell Connery
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Tom Ritter
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Richard Barnes
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Andrew Sullivan
- [DNSOP] draft-grothoff (was Re: discussion for dr… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Florian Weimer
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Hugo Connery
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett