Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt
hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org> Tue, 17 March 2015 01:47 UTC
Return-Path: <hellekin@gnu.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21D61ACDD9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cSgPEw-9QvAS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BE7F1ACDE2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ol168-138.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.138.168]:39476 helo=raiz.hellekin.gnu) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1YXgbB-0007ZQ-2g for dnsop@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:47:13 -0400
Message-ID: <55078791.50300@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:46:57 -0300
From: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Organization: https://gnu.org/consensus
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAFggDF0XX3v7yGsaCwFnE7cjK0yz4-frxFgoBJfnztO8k-LFBg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503162052420.20709@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503162052420.20709@bofh.nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/LReRBfPyybZksi7czn3dOIywv4k>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:47:38 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/16/15 22:14, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: > >> Subject: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt > > Is this meant to replace or augment > draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names ? > *** This draft only covers .onion, one of the two pTLDs related to the Tor Project in the P2PNames draft, so the obvious answer is that it won't replace it. Now the P2PNames draft certainly can benefit from this discussion and will be amended accordingly. I'd rather amend the P2PNames draft and look forward to the adoption of the 6 pTLDs at once, instead of having to do all the work again TLD by TLD: again, the argument for a single draft is that all 6 pTLDs present a coherent set of similar technical considerations (see introduction of the latest P2PNames draft). I understand the scope of this draft is to facilitate the adoption of .onion in the context of resolving the actual need of proper issuance of SSL certificates for .onion domains. Of course I would prefer that this onion draft serves as a solid foundation to focus the discussion of adopting new Special-Use TLDs without distraction. Therefore I propose we don't mention the P2PNames draft in this thread and keep thinking about Jake's proposal for just .onion. == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVB4eCXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9CsoP/iPBGOiY6CjnxyPc3/1zu3QX Tk95AfLbZ9gCpcEiRu0MFe8+gPzj2bmE9A8oj1uIF9Nqm3qel+lhXuUcCaBEQr1y OoPj+tCVp/3TYAEybRXoVOWPnbt0oQBRZJEIWUK+cEqsweICeM1v7z3k16YCPkO0 rySGYCFtxZsD4tweDRBmwyICmbsXDdQGR8UBsGGGP/6G8b9PgdACodvyyZ6CWpsP VCvpuNuX/H1RCyyG3IrfT6Qn8sRistkMEhRCA9aA40Q1jBXhwNigQ+7jJPih2pia FCAjo7qoRquw+klvJHfBpR42hT3V4Za05cRUt4mYsN6YV6VUxjBYrc6u6o8szWvH fX9n3MVsWlCYDj/xGmaxOtqa1TKlU6Zzk+Y6M1aDxP8cDSZVg6Ro1zE4hBVG9v5A 7JTEgaBLrGdIC+alm82hQrJ+s4MZyrFKlgVM+iIaMuNMfkhx9IpcKVDt7lO7SJPO 3cgo0jJ3h2WS+xoQFJHuXmLmaS4iQZsuB29Zk95bE7PX2SquG46/n/GQtCcfX49f JPES+fkMBykbwZI39n57mdACPOMNlDXl5Jo2NnX9DdjRpHlTgPJWnTPcj71YA6St XU8jGjKjs5kO/cvPaRu6VoRy54eF/wyjnTy3oK0vagiEs7pXOqhMdi4gyMDDKvxJ S36sNjHCMuZH8jFEDP7e =6OwG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Cake
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Rubens Kuhl
- [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onio… Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Christian Grothoff
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Richard Barnes
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Cake
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Hugo Maxwell Connery
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Tom Ritter
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Richard Barnes
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Andrew Sullivan
- [DNSOP] draft-grothoff (was Re: discussion for dr… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Florian Weimer
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Hugo Connery
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-… Alec Muffett