IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Tue, 17 March 2015 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC651A8737 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kNrdi641IPlf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51E51A8756 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdbni2 with SMTP id ni2so14401126pdb.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=k6yELnScqjrmSpS4Foh03L5RTlHwB/y4QWoTClMSoog=; b=kZ3JtAX6OZiWGlb3P1CMtdMVKbSHEE+mLTKeW6VqA3gfghp54G18HZX2xqayEwbD9Q 2ZcKzhl7/pkODOmi6aSZ0c4ehA5IGNWtA48BKqPpjTEIf7wxfuXiTcLmyEkpwiiBNTtt A/rPDPjfomy2Tp0TxxZsnRHFknzfkS+py4wJbFrVkI9dzez92/rffoQp7S9SJsOtl63X jc9vVw5Mpofe7dvddKkWp2NlD9V1YjWpcX6pnQtG65WjLxxs+5R6mQgaV2hMHgfnzufz m7WF+aWrrRdPnTUCkhhBuOoXQsMovtJGb+5ANXqP1Z3nbcE1j/7DGkIfuGmtbT3Ar52F kmug==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklX6D2OhQinqrDHqVO3M8/GKpbh3kiP+TXyFmQHjkinCzOq4ft/0HC0pdfex3culV3vvoy
X-Received: by 10.66.218.10 with SMTP id pc10mr151587327pac.116.1426610566261; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.9] ([73.162.11.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w1sm23253199pdp.25.2015.03.17.09.42.44 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5C1BDB49-A6C7-4AA0-8672-C578E50E872A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b5
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <550851A4.9030306@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:42:42 -0700
Message-Id: <F3BE8C23-9C4E-47F6-9FEF-C3789D68A6A9@virtualized.org>
References: <CAFggDF0XX3v7yGsaCwFnE7cjK0yz4-frxFgoBJfnztO8k-LFBg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503162052420.20709@bofh.nohats.ca> <D12DE3BF.B714%alecm@fb.com> <55084532.9010504@gnunet.org> <46B5350F-EADB-42C8-9013-54FA3DFC57E5@virtualized.org> <550851A4.9030306@gnu.org>
To: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/95LV5t70mv3BtXlKmsT_FxJqHlI>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:42:48 -0000

Hellekin,

> On Mar 17, 2015, at 9:09 AM, hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org> wrote:
>> My personal observation is that one of the problems with your draft
> *** Maybe you should direct comments on the P2PNames draft to the
> P2PNames conversation.  Your comment suggests that the Introduction
> section of the draft did not convince you, yet you didn't say anything
> about it, which demonstrates the lack of interest in moving it forward.

Actually, I did comment on draft-grothoff. Several times. In fact, in response to you back in January (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13054.html), I said:

"...
Overall:

As with previous versions of this draft, I believe it should be broken up into separate drafts for each of the proposed 6761 special names registry entries.
..."

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email