IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] proposal: Covert in-band zone data

Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Mon, 08 July 2019 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D29712006A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 13:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rGvw39_2nGu5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 13:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pch.net (keriomail.pch.net [206.220.231.84]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB795120280 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 13:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Footer: cGNoLm5ldA==
Received: from [10.19.48.53] ([69.166.14.2]) (authenticated user woody@pch.net) by mail.pch.net (Kerio Connect 9.2.7 patch 3) with ESMTPSA (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)); Mon, 8 Jul 2019 13:28:33 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Message-Id: <ADE6371D-4096-4EA0-A214-192E48D7714E@pch.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BDFEDC02-02CC-4B6C-ADCD-40EA3A2359C0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 13:28:33 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAJhMdTNvO=TjNUV=6wHwLJB_c+tqwk4zY24jGbi5a0SqdSUsag@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Witold Krecicki <wpk@isc.org>, dnsop@ietf.org
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
References: <20190706213024.GA56650@isc.org> <CAJhMdTMwCiAS+S_j-i3BXPZ=G1zVhAq+YKH07RsDWRgezPhejg@mail.gmail.com> <caa695e7-21e6-9c41-1814-1f4c1d64df7f@isc.org> <CAJhMdTPK3iqg4sF0Kr+jGAXTf2MZ8FAP0DgwQw1kVBHa65wTNA@mail.gmail.com> <191886397.1948062.1562455685612.JavaMail.zimbra@isc.org> <CAJhMdTNvO=TjNUV=6wHwLJB_c+tqwk4zY24jGbi5a0SqdSUsag@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9waKZBSZTf2cfkKNM2tVVjpS66I>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] proposal: Covert in-band zone data
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:28:46 -0000


> On Jul 6, 2019, at 4:46 PM, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> TSIG secrets are rarely rolled in practice, in my experience, and
> being able to improve upon that also seems useful.

Very much agreed, whether using this mechanism or other.

                                -Bill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email