Re: [DNSOP] proposal: Covert in-band zone data

Witold Krecicki <wpk@isc.org> Mon, 08 July 2019 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <wpk@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AC6120058 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 13:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GcYvrJpFHQBr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 13:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D69B6120033 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 13:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56653AB000; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 20:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88624160051; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 20:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBEC16006B; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 20:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id KfzNG2F73bTY; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 20:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.69.142] (unknown [31.179.189.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B18D3160051; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 20:57:21 +0000 (UTC)
To: jabley@hopcount.ca
Cc: Wessels Duane <dwessels@verisign.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <20190706213024.GA56650@isc.org> <CAJhMdTMwCiAS+S_j-i3BXPZ=G1zVhAq+YKH07RsDWRgezPhejg@mail.gmail.com> <caa695e7-21e6-9c41-1814-1f4c1d64df7f@isc.org> <CAJhMdTPK3iqg4sF0Kr+jGAXTf2MZ8FAP0DgwQw1kVBHa65wTNA@mail.gmail.com> <191886397.1948062.1562455685612.JavaMail.zimbra@isc.org> <CAJhMdTNvO=TjNUV=6wHwLJB_c+tqwk4zY24jGbi5a0SqdSUsag@mail.gmail.com> <561203a3-7fd9-94cc-5b13-3639b123f8e2@isc.org> <C467FE93-F6CE-4DB4-80E8-654B1485A1F6@hopcount.ca> <BCD5A218-CF1A-4569-B8A2-7BC8B499CC4B@verisign.com> <a0309614-bd25-08d4-003d-4615779910f6@isc.org> <E3C51B06-8EA9-4634-B931-61A06985A811@hopcount.ca>
From: Witold Krecicki <wpk@isc.org>
Message-ID: <3878fa84-6655-9450-a06d-7d1c1a3591c9@isc.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 22:57:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E3C51B06-8EA9-4634-B931-61A06985A811@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xj3Ur4BjZI1mSfewxDwlRK-YCmo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] proposal: Covert in-band zone data
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:57:26 -0000


W dniu 08.07.2019 o 22:40, jabley@hopcount.ca pisze:
> Hi Witold,
> 
> On Jul 8, 2019, at 16:05, Witold Krecicki <wpk@isc.org> wrote:
> 
> W dniu 08.07.2019 o 19:20, Wessels, Duane pisze:
> 
>> One more thing - this feature is intended for operators, not for regular
>> users. We should have more tolerance for shootfooting features there.
> 
> I don't have anything extra to add to my earlier observations and I understand in general the points you are making.
> 
> One small thing though, on your text above -- I'm not sure precisely what you mean by those words, but it seems possible that you're distinguishing between large, commercial DNS service operators and others who might be smaller, non-commercial, hobbyist, amateur, or something.

People querying DNS servers vs people operating DNS servers that are
queried, it's just that.

Witold