Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-jjmb-sunset4-dns-forwarding-ipv4aas-00.txt

"Ebersman, Paul" <Paul_Ebersman@cable.comcast.com> Tue, 03 November 2015 08:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Paul_Ebersman@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184D61B2FD9; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:41:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.225
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K2Bj5bbZrm82; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:41:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (PACDCMHOUT01.cable.comcast.com [68.87.31.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B57EF1B2FD8; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:41:24 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 44571fa7-f79626d0000011ff-9c-563873339caa
Received: from PACDCEXHUB03.cable.comcast.com (cas-umc02.ndceast.pa.bo.comcast.net [68.87.34.28]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id E3.8A.04607.33378365; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 03:41:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PACDCEX46.cable.comcast.com (24.40.2.145) by pacdcexhub03.cable.comcast.com (24.40.56.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 03:41:21 -0500
Received: from PACDCEX41.cable.comcast.com (24.40.2.140) by PACDCEX46.cable.comcast.com (24.40.2.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 03:41:20 -0500
Received: from PACDCEX41.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8b0c]) by PACDCEX41.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8b0c%19]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 03:41:20 -0500
From: "Ebersman, Paul" <Paul_Ebersman@cable.comcast.com>
To: Alain Durand <alain.durand@icann.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-jjmb-sunset4-dns-forwarding-ipv4aas-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRFULoj5kci0QYE0qOj0vHcZz1Qp6IuEKAgAFR1ID//7xVuoAAAnyZgACEYgCAAALSgA==
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:41:20 +0000
Message-ID: <737F9831-0823-42CB-B6CE-19CD1E256532@cable.comcast.com>
References: <20151102074846.14431.30976.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D25D44C3.1913B8%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com> <D25E5E26.1916A1%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com> <20151103052757.DAF2D3BBB299@rock.dv.isc.org> <20151103053711.A9AF43BBB46A@rock.dv.isc.org> <D25DD742.AF98%alain.durand@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <D25DD742.AF98%alain.durand@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [96.115.73.253]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4ED3144C-F725-4014-85D4-7274DE86279F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrDKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXiEq4ko2tcbBFmsGiaksXLpl3sFjN7/jFa 3H1zmcXi/bozbBavTq1htLjy4j6Lxco9+9ktWo/eZHXg8Dh7ZAGjx5TfG1k9Dl+4z+KxZMlP Jo+Zx7+weDx4/I45gC2KyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK+PjjiVsBUf4K3oOzmBrYFzL28XIwSEhYCLx rFO2i5ETyBSTuHBvPRuILSSwi0ni7hnLLkYuIHsPo8Tk6xdZIZxdjBKXPx9gh6g6wShx/60Q iM0mYCHx82s3M8hQEQFNiZ6GGJB6ZoFDTBIP+7eATRUWSJGY9G8RM4gtIpAqcXryFRYIO0yi 8+83sJksAioSfTOvMIHYvAIuEtdX7mOC2LWNSeLJCj2Q+ZwCxhLX9yaAhBmBjv5+ag1YCbOA uMStJ/OZIJ4RkXh48TQbhC0q8fLxP1YI20Bi69J9LBC2osS+DyuYIe6cxijxr/syG8ReQYmT M5+wQOzVkbh1cSIzRIO4xOEjO1gnMErNQrJvFrL+WUj6IYq0JZYtfM0MYetJvGx6xw5hy0ts fzsHKm4psX7HJ6i4rcS6de+heu0kHk1bxLqAkXMVo1xBYnJKcm5GfmmJgaFecmJSTqpecn5u cmJxCYjexAhOR/LLdzDee+F0iFGAg1GJhzc8zyJMiDWxrLgy9xCjCtDARxtWX2CUYsnLz0tV EuEtCARK86YkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYfYpTmYFES591871eokEB6YklqdmpqQWoRTJaJg1OqgVE5 fcdxzawbT7YVTC0PttFauFnvj49QRqiC3Y9y7tULmF+ttbA3nPrdR8Wss0fN6mla9AnNwswp O4Rv5NrudX8mK7bqOsOfVXquVcY1+R4TtT8uL7kkX/F5XtLzZVefp/PPjZd4w2+9dnW58fKJ K/r0ii2VH8x6vjUv29KRYdK1+sSADctPuSmxFGckGmoxFxUnAgDvbF8VTwMAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/H4R6Z_EtqCDmAsF745r85sMwmas>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:46:02 -0800
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>, "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-jjmb-sunset4-dns-forwarding-ipv4aas-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:41:26 -0000

On 03Nov, 2015, at 5:31 PM, Alain Durand <alain.durand@icann.org> wrote:

> In the particular case of the communication between the CPE and the ISP
> DNS recursive resolver, the two parties are within the same administrative
> authority. Thus, the need to make a BCP is much lower. This can be seen
> as simply an implementation issue. In other words, there are other
> solutions that could be used, for example a translation of the DNS packets
> from IPv4 to IPv6. Such a translation may or may not be optimal, but it
> would work and, more importantly, would not break the DNS resolution and
> would have no impact on the stability of the DNS system as a whole.

Putting in a second DNS server that does nothing but forward everything just to
translate v4 to v6 does indeed have an impact on stability if you try to do it
at large scale. It impacts infrastructure costs, performance and potentlally confuses
geo-ip/cdn. It also adds complexity in debugging.