IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 13 December 2016 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797241294C6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:16:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNEJH2-SDnfT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4EF1294C3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id n21so126898384qka.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:16:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=G2CAp6odvhi8q8q8jbrDd1mEyXb8ByH4l1qQzNAzJNY=; b=lH6dgndg9rDvmupzM+SWTERfSlbIf5xsMg52w6MlRIo5+CUbIUzyHQGF4YHPVm1Zvn ATqwaSSQq0Ztp595xjnEa1m2JeXMLpPBzcBNw2+IHY3154HQtEqV5yNbz4DLRJADk2bT nOiy+5DzdomvqxddYo1zk+a3jRFrm+fLxOjnRozPOw2DlLGvynPvOlwztpoWy7PG+Mj7 p3u3JouFExh1NTfSXjCZ5wdTKy7Co83ZrvtW/sm1LUupY3gxyWbzmkrYPzYIooN7fS+X qYuq/wl1rxVYlD/QCoLtk9/SOPg/X0WTM6hefxrzFOb6HEFVDQiI4akmqnTe9PPdgFfE 2SIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=G2CAp6odvhi8q8q8jbrDd1mEyXb8ByH4l1qQzNAzJNY=; b=l1v36KX/hu44/RqbsstUwrNtcLtp9vITRwYJdM4gst7/CLlDpDaurpqPtABTu8VA3U pmdN+TtHwNHwzXkr60EL98xoUTNRUFhzxSAt6FiCtOR8W/90aM0+4nEDuFm4dF1ZiS2o iAbfcVFUJSF4X8tYZnw36K9tMCqdQUT5MtGQCL0BjoA7IM7Vsoh0NRT60YdUFXqI0UxK Lh8aAhaWfDUFMv7KA+P1bZnL5r5VpcYLyDgqxl7A41CUQfBzX4d5RU2BcZoRAZof0+m3 3BaSCi/m+mfwKBa2V+Lv63X/kGVLeaaVTzUmR3vDwvSR53/1sIw8/oOvtF21+OKS0Rra XrKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01czYmO4SaHPy+jgSDahMD4YgQalNS4/4+hxTdpK/1QcFhRWEGfbsUkHsXAs1yrWTtZ7a1fAlYuLTdnqFvn
X-Received: by 10.55.70.67 with SMTP id t64mr97026686qka.78.1481656608133; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:16:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+EJ0LO=pU-yUdEHwC3aP5KdXxsnD9kEvmmTeAoe0BxK3A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+EJ0LO=pU-yUdEHwC3aP5KdXxsnD9kEvmmTeAoe0BxK3A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:16:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+uwq9ofZ6hdG7Ngyz4s23F0XgiMSzazwFKw7DiTcEFDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114ab0f8ced8ff05438f0f1f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/JAP4Tw6--lD6du56FdvXwk4719A>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:16:52 -0000

The authors think that they have captured / addressed everyone's comments -
if we missed (or misunderstood) anything, it was unintentional.
W

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, 2:13 PM tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> All
>
> The process of WGLC for this document engaged the working group and there
> was much discussion and several different versions.  It seems that the
> authors have addressed everything that has been brought up.
>
> We felt another formal Working Group Last call was needed, though
> hopefully shorter.
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for:
>         "Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3"
>       draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse
>
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/
>
> For those looking for the differences, these are the differences between
> the document submitted, and the current one:
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-02&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-03
>
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone
> feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with
> your reasons.
>
>
> This starts a *one* week Working Group Last Call process, and ends at
> midnight 20  December  2016 UTC.
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email