IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 13 December 2016 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7055C129472 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:13:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-hyLYCckUrj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D241294A7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id h30so44364iod.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:13:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=elfdOoLVPBANsg5VvNyaIy31SxKCa2e8ywDMPW9wnbU=; b=UgCyiWs4vP/rcm2kYrq7KmF2P6XhBvB7bEeRkL5IGrSAnpPpr6vBbCWZvgWrClzJZh dEFjP0CWw239KpGcRz2S2UybxylaRs4MUJ1kTnuaYIMb80J3iihjYPaeaqXqbsPqRXY2 t0BeTHw/crceKMZPIDXjov5oWIKw5+xUDEmHiUehlEJoJqRcbMBuxj8ljB8i4nmb3Vaq NTVWrB8BtQl7XytdFct8ObWABo/0muWdDGKIm+suQjAMgjKQFnYL3MOfVJ8kVTsWj3PA RilDsNvm1gIvO8+L/Ll3e4H/2BT4ufA6dnuyFiGnyIhpGzOuRkymrk4h/QkUEZuGxu7T ObqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=elfdOoLVPBANsg5VvNyaIy31SxKCa2e8ywDMPW9wnbU=; b=OhMWRTEpAI6XxzkL1heD30MXckFqjsfNjRLf14jVHKzGRAWS5shD5X6dggk8lqqmHY Q2U+BvVfIx9QtW00tIANW8y4Feu1EzQTxGt/nXHNtcw9won/IC1py1fPu5ZSIG3CBaxe 4Pbq9AiysUabhLvS8DbnJkg/4RPps3aWnJRQ1fL5LkVF8dGGRUFQrF9mG7CQHuoO/XWp p++icIkAXwZbeXC7N2GRFohcb8e5VLc1RHQNQRF2pie5mbp8i9veiP32hKVuXACk3vCI Ls0mTgjP9GnVosf6HmORy+Zxot9jryeEeGWREaaeRTDZrb7jW0PKwofaDXuRGGMOUYnM Xgdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02tz3xpba/r4Hu4B1yC0Qzs0e59NCXnfSywbPlhqgL9TrpAs0eI9TvF1tjI6fcoGbhYGKB53X8iiQ/raA==
X-Received: by 10.36.92.145 with SMTP id q139mr4025678itb.107.1481656407761; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:13:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.163.19 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:13:27 -0800 (PST)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:13:27 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EJ0LO=pU-yUdEHwC3aP5KdXxsnD9kEvmmTeAoe0BxK3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144b5c0dd3acc05438f0307"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Ux7PEIfLxp-GCDsRZLMltEOqeX0>
Subject: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:13:41 -0000

All

The process of WGLC for this document engaged the working group and there
was much discussion and several different versions.  It seems that the
authors have addressed everything that has been brought up.

We felt another formal Working Group Last call was needed, though hopefully
shorter.

This starts a Working Group Last Call for:
        "Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3"
      draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse

Current versions of the draft is available here:
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/

For those looking for the differences, these are the differences between
the document submitted, and the current one:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-02&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-03

Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone feels
the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with your
reasons.


This starts a *one* week Working Group Last Call process, and ends at
midnight 20  December  2016 UTC.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email