IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 21 December 2016 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB65129663 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:58:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I0PgQoBmdzww for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B17A01295B7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 31E6931D8C; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:58:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2A74CA03D; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:53:38 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:53:38 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Message-ID: <20161221205338.GC26549@sources.org>
References: <CADyWQ+EJ0LO=pU-yUdEHwC3aP5KdXxsnD9kEvmmTeAoe0BxK3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqeVEsPA8ySOGQFB_Q99hyvtzy_1dey7ddwDv+zvdT779Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqeVEsPA8ySOGQFB_Q99hyvtzy_1dey7ddwDv+zvdT779Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.6
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sodzC_3pr6tuBdqEA55PkaShxHs>
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:58:10 -0000

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:34:52AM -0800,
 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote 
 a message of 143 lines which said:

> - Title: "Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3"
> 
>   I think this should now be e.g., "Aggressive use of DNSSEC-validated
>   cache" because of the equal weight given to the aggressive use of
>   deduced wildcards.

Strong +1 to this one. Not sure about the rest of your remarks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email