Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Sun, 12 March 2017 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAE6129413 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4EtOc-q9cZJF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6319F1294A8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vhHKH6rw8z3P0; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:29:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1489361396; bh=GdJBpNZzrIgE/zcDAY0h6TpkkOKP+cwNWJ4ewHsmuKA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=aujZePsr8h/72sw3O2CuGdZFH7wkcy4wv06FED6W3TMKcIW+K/lEzcBfYU2xOUTzm LMmrxJuoIl7ajeSmG0As6XDXPWz1Q2E9lCJ9GlMiHkky4REidC2eqHYA5Ae6R4B1jL L4TX3+VM0q21725xIZXnftlGy5vt2Jq7pSPKovqE=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtWwzu45efDn; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:29:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:29:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 358F2322DC1; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:29:52 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 358F2322DC1
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237E6407E851; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:29:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:29:51 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <333CCE99-82E2-44C9-97ED-2222540097ED@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703121924170.11053@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <333CCE99-82E2-44C9-97ED-2222540097ED@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.999 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/N2N5SN7c-EkASB8ExF8yD0eDrJw>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:29:58 -0000

On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Suzanne Woolf wrote:

> This message opens a Working Group Last Call for:
> "The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain"
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/
> Intended status: Proposed Standard
> 
> Per the discussion in our interim meeting a couple of weeks ago, the editors have revised this document and the chairs are opening a Working Group Last Call. 
> 
> Please let us know, on the list, whether you support advancing draft-dnsop-alt-tld-08 to the IESG for publication.
> 
> The document has been stable for awhile except for one significant change in the new version. As discussed in the interim, it now clarifies that “.alt” is intended for
> use with domain names intended to be resolved outside of the DNS protocol. 
> 
> With IETF 98 upon us, we’re giving this a little extra time (3 weeks).
> 
> Starts: 13 March 2017
> Ends:  3 April 2017

How can we start a Last Call on this when we still have no idea within dnsop or
even within the IETF in general whether we are going to continue issuing
Special Use domains?

And aren't we still in the process of getting a problem statement
completed as RFC?

I also thought we were currently not letting anyone use the Special-Use
domains RFC 6761 for any new requests? If we are allowing this, should
we also not do additional calls for the other requests that have been
pending?

It seems the chairs are making a decision in this problem space by
starting a Last Call now, which I think is not the right continuation
of the process we started on.

Paul