IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 16 July 2015 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ABE1A897B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-hXMn8mnpFS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:cfab]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EADF1A8978 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232301036F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:23:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hJndL4WBg7la for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:23:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (unknown [88.128.80.207]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2551B1000B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:23:25 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:23:24 +0200
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150716122323.GC14463@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <CAEKtLiQWPM6yJZZASQ5k1bzsbHc3jv5FRsJ6ifgUdj9TRLCmRg@mail.gmail.com> <83A64168-3510-4E0B-AA23-54547C05990B@vpnc.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1507141719130.32296@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <55A543CD.6010008@gmail.com> <CAEKtLiRQVgQRnm51gSb0e9zhmQ7vYVJXdPBQsSLXqHo_hiAKyw@mail.gmail.com> <20150716003359.GD13926@mx2.yitter.info> <20150716091519.47a6bbdd@casual> <CAHw9_iJt-A7xuZ35qdnhPL7x=J15X5fWTHv_hP=DThAPfC2K0g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJt-A7xuZ35qdnhPL7x=J15X5fWTHv_hP=DThAPfC2K0g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PsCQ9NYFRytu-WE_BY4-Iqc6Zp4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:23:28 -0000

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:30:03PM +0200, Warren Kumari wrote:
> We shouldn't be figuring out how useful a WG is by the number of
> documents published, but I don't think DNSOP is still where documents
> go to die...

Agreed, but I also don't want to return to that bleak past where we
could never get anything published because it wasn't perfect, and then
the number of recycles got high enough that nobody would review, so
the draft wasn't perfect, and so on.  The editors will put their heads
together once more on the basis of the most recent comments.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email