Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers
Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Thu, 05 November 2015 07:20 UTC
Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB3D1B35B3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:20:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9nl0aG5niBG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E316F1B2A8D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbww6 with SMTP id ww6so33186577obb.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 23:20:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=XZrsThAjnbHP9OZ5t8QwZWqiyyyTr/uwl9LaFUHGp1c=; b=AwRbh+cb9gxF6sBE4nHltvOM/aFQRPFYzb0V4lDssOas5pJy7VsBQnZrkUaw/ozEuw jZmiPzMjSfuAbvJ526nXGPuwd8aKhFsctRTfyjrTvjwL3CricuyMCgKS1Y9fgyDN7QXa VqgYCW3EdB6l20v4TIRUZQ3hRj6xDpXlPySMgY4N3jEtXSlJmGWg8uiEXsOxSGMHnieH b6y3phPz4hjFop801ry12mMT9XGJhFm0KEwD2MT6M+mySGHgssA5hF9v3gNavnHVrtoi 67EgYs8gqCkXAUKquV3ik7sjSgqQt96MKNEkRuPaGpAcRIGgtM1cuWs80LkilE//Kt/L eAYw==
X-Received: by 10.60.65.6 with SMTP id t6mr3722222oes.47.1446708029321; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 23:20:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.131.193 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:20:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1E5B644E-EA0D-4287-8AB5-1907EE06BE1C@hopcount.ca>
References: <1E5B644E-EA0D-4287-8AB5-1907EE06BE1C@hopcount.ca>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 02:20:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEH+z2nnK5GF-N9Lf70dLYfEvr=OgR74cWXyMchpmMu5cA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PsScNAIrl-7tN-3tHpg3NJE6_aU>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 07:20:31 -0000
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote: > Hi all, > > I couldn't quite interpret the questions and hums in the room; was the > consensus > > (a) this clarification is not needed; the existing spec is clear enough, or > > (b) a clarification might be useful, but the proposed clarification in the > document is wrong, or > > (c) something else? > > If it's (b), I could collect more of the kinds of insights that were > provided at the mic and update the proposal. > > If it's (a), I can happily just shut up about and move on with other things > :-) I believe that in theory the result of the hum was (a) but it may be that many people thought (b)... Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com > Joe
- [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Donald Eastlake
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Niall O'Reilly
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Paul Vixie
- [DNSOP] Ambiguous standards suck (was Re: draft-j… Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers Mark Andrews