[DNSOP] mailing list behavior Re: Current DNSOP thread and why 1024 bits

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Wed, 02 April 2014 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717D71A025F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 08:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OU72UbRKrhXx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 08:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBC11A028C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 08:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x3so358475qcv.26 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 08:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=r7ecxVi5DADJQ9B26nT8MUNrZxxtoeQevf3PLLgMwtQ=; b=HjYcds3snufxb6l/fwRJwPxamDBQdzog6A5E5ph7y9+MrG7kBUe4f66cbk6zarlP2m Xld7IOWvxxuIPrxfvImDoscXPthLaxK4EYlHNzJy6lLiLEltHiXLGU9rruCbD7djr005 MaFbLh0usenhnQpLcj1N9GZ4nAduZ7XDaSAP+Za0UxSR+YwrIbmVGH54LrWr6C4hKAMQ 6xikKrCU3vfhAA9uTdtyNRuOTGVw2D69BnC44Zj8ZF/v006Fzr+YB21iJWmR1O1VIIEQ Bjag2S/rgAcRodwMptZ+mJdrlMXFwux62WfuLNoJutLONmYSi907cyQy8dwqGEj4FJSQ fl/w==
X-Received: by 10.224.49.67 with SMTP id u3mr1219178qaf.63.1396451883808; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 08:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:6:3a80:77e:f4da:750c:9957:d955? ([2601:6:3a80:77e:f4da:750c:9957:d955]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 21sm2966127qgh.23.2014.04.02.08.18.02 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Apr 2014 08:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ED3B19A8-D4AD-46AC-84BD-9FD1C333EAF0@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:18:01 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A8DE4B3A-DCDB-44D0-8AAB-02C3F4C51DD9@gmail.com>
References: <0EA28BE8-E872-46BA-85FD-7333A1E13172@icsi.berkeley.edu> <53345C77.8040603@uni-due.de> <B7893984-2FAD-472D-9A4E-766A5C212132@pch.net> <102C13BE-E45E-437A-A592-FA373FF5C8F0@ogud.com> <474B0834-C16B-4843-AA0A-FC2A2085FEFB@icsi.berkeley.edu> <CAMm+Lwh-G7D5Cjx4NWMOhTjBZd=VVRHiPdK7L1zm-P0QRP8P2Q@mail.gmail.com> <knJn1n01E0xxhYs01nJoHJ> <1904697C-49EF-4F77-A71A-3E0E4FC16575@cox.net> <ED3B19A8-D4AD-46AC-84BD-9FD1C333EAF0@icsi.berkeley.edu>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bI_j3GgU9tBhtzeMo9mo6cQRTx8
Subject: [DNSOP] mailing list behavior Re: Current DNSOP thread and why 1024 bits
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:18:24 -0000

Colleagues,

We've noted the tone some participants in the key length discussion have taken, and the complaints about it. 

We're handling off-list, in accordance with IETF mailing list moderation policy. 

Understood that this is a frustrating topic, but less heat, more light, please.


thanks,
Suzanne & Tim