Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04.txt
Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 20:02 UTC
Return-Path: <rgibson@dyn.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4AE129B5B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:02:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dyn.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z8_7kj7Cr3N6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:02:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x248.google.com (mail-vk0-x248.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16031129B5A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:02:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x248.google.com with SMTP id 23so26258859vkc.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:02:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dyn.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DQJMHKiFcJKChNkHZS1MvYvaDWOBBWp2kldwP+rQFus=; b=ctGWtoK3IXiWiOapxbC2ZUGIP7tX+0GWM7Z2LpbXwNK6RVB9l2A/FxP0k8w69l/yzB tyhtddVVARrjf8BFwJ08sN0w20NMPyAr3BVrSoxQ2kcEJhSW9QMn4Eux24PvsP5PxY7F lPSRM7R7KpLCS6NjglIHqj2jNm+e7eh/PUoxc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DQJMHKiFcJKChNkHZS1MvYvaDWOBBWp2kldwP+rQFus=; b=dHvEfdwHx9NSkQfxE+i8xMt4jqhMgDXWvCkLPftvTjlfGxyZ8hOrJGjQSqVbudLudo i51YSTdwGddjIYC71b4SUI4DpEdbrceDniSVoe389zfLKKU5xrgFxwQY1ZsktLMEqdIE BWzaC9RGOZnwI3gRe9dce7dPTCkERpAwSOs6SUzrA88AfX+RvWl7/Q9rlc8nPZfibLwh 1vj8jG3whZWnW0TMpy8wggJw0SXMAgW3PzTJoED+LR9gs3gWtAlWtn2cFQAOeL82Nu60 sAkCT86BJ2KArGwR7vjffNAj/DA/RiwH+BWXaVDW/X8oZQO1oDUIZfSrjG801jNCTRvr 6JKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39ld3VBBJUW4pCxl3wX6KGoYxZRPWv0p23Dph2Yh/z/SGOBlRMYHuRT0L1nackS4w/fkOQBJN+7z1uAmDe0k
X-Received: by 10.31.63.88 with SMTP id m85mr4409292vka.158.1486756938102; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:02:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.5.131 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:01:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAN6NTqy9_jKXT4Fc9KhmcW7Fq6DTiU2HmzBoWn+YA1fALOh5zA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <148661979638.4286.4234665114055399732.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC94RYZM+KMS2c3CVx=8Q005XYGQqNRv--23H7_aTpuY05tEMQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6NTqy9_jKXT4Fc9KhmcW7Fq6DTiU2HmzBoWn+YA1fALOh5zA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:01:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC94RYYhV0ye252bLNSGPmqQhdZ772AkaJ7us86X1j4nppsWDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114dccfe29f4610548329372"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/cTjBVy46tMDBWsR7VK3EjLguJo8>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 20:02:21 -0000
Because without such a signal, humans using ANY for legitimate diagnostic purposes have no means of differentiating section 4.1/4.3 "subset" responses from conventional responses where there just happen to be only a small number of RRSets at the queried name, encouraging (or at least doing nothing to dissuade) a conclusion that the response is in fact conventional and complete. On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com> wrote: > Thank you for your comments > > Q: why do you think it is useful to complicate things with a EDNS0 flag ? > > Olafur > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com> wrote: > >> With full realization that this is coming very late in the game, we had a >> great deal of internal conversation within Dyn about implementing >> refuse-any, and came away unsatisfied with both the "subset" and "HINFO" >> approaches—the latter because of reasons that have already been covered, >> and the former for lacking in-band signaling of non-"conventional" >> incompleteness to aid legitimate use. >> >> I believe there is sufficient cause to reserve a new OPT record EDNS >> header flag bit >> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xhtml#dns-parameters-13> >> for indicating "partial response" (as distinct from "truncation"). It will >> be safely ignored by current clients, but convey the desired information to >> those in the know. >> >> P.S. Our discussion also raised some more minor points: >> >> - Insisting that the HINFO OS field SHOULD be empty ("set to the null >> string") seems a little too strong; there's room in it for (and value >> from) a short explanation (e.g., cloudflare.com. 3789 IN HINFO "Please >> stop asking for ANY" "See draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any"). I'd prefer >> text like "The OS field of the HINFO RDATA SHOULD be short to >> minimize the size of the response, and MAY be empty or MAY include a >> summarized description of local policy." >> - "Conventional [ANY] response" is used but not defined. >> - "ANY does not mean ALL" is misleading—RFC 1035 >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035#section-3.2.3> is clear about >> QTYPE=255 being "a request for *all* records" (emphasis mine). That >> said, the proposed *response* behavior is consistent with that RFC. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:56 AM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>> directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the >>> IETF. >>> >>> Title : Providing Minimal-Sized Responses to DNS >>> Queries that have QTYPE=ANY >>> Authors : Joe Abley >>> Olafur Gudmundsson >>> Marek Majkowski >>> Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04.txt >>> Pages : 10 >>> Date : 2017-02-08 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> The Domain Name System (DNS) specifies a query type (QTYPE) "ANY". >>> The operator of an authoritative DNS server might choose not to >>> respond to such queries for reasons of local policy, motivated by >>> security, performance or other reasons. >>> >>> The DNS specification does not include specific guidance for the >>> behaviour of DNS servers or clients in this situation. This document >>> aims to provide such guidance. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any/ >>> >>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>> submission >>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> DNSOP mailing list >>> DNSOP@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> >> >
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-0… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Ólafur Guðmundsson
- [DNSOP] Review of draft [draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-… Woodworth, John R
- Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft [draft-ietf-dnsop-ref… Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Woodworth, John R
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Robert Edmonds
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Wessels, Duane
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Wessels, Duane
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-a… Tony Finch