Re: [DNSOP] extension of DoH to authoritative servers

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 01:48:36PM -0800,
 Paul Vixie <[e-mail]> wrote 
 a message of 46 lines which said:

> increased for political reasons.

There is nothing wrong with political reasons. Mass surveillance is a
political problem (privacy). DNS lies by ISPs is a political problem
(network neutrality). It is perfectly normal that IETF develops stuff
for political reasons. (Everybody have read RFC 8280?)

> google, ibm, cloudflare, cisco, and other so-called "public dns"
> providers will at some point choose whether to offer DoH from shared
> addresses, making those shared addresses into risks that the rest of
> us have to manage differently; or whether to dedicate DoH to well
> known addresses that can be outright blocked.

It seems to be an issue with DoC
<https://blog.powerdns.com/2019/02/07/the-big-dns-privacy-debate-at-fosdem/>,
not really DoH itself.