Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Thu, 21 February 2019 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4174131108 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:05:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PST7-WlP96mD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:05:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB058130E46 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:05:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2693AB041; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE9D2160073; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:05:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAFB160072; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:05:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id U9WqR2VnaL6s; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:05:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.30.42.88] (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BC6B160050; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:05:03 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-21E99C46-29B6-47F6-948C-732376CB9D04
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57)
In-Reply-To: <382BAB3C-C127-46E1-B931-4717A33BD75A@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:05:01 +1100
Cc: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <4BF142EA-B2FB-4B00-9940-8A70FFEE5F6C@isc.org>
References: <155053239541.25848.12960190085730298684.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <969D8BA1-6ED3-47E8-AFFD-2BEE8EA3E66B@bangj.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902191219070.766@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <0DE33073-93B1-4CF5-B12D-B7266E21E8B2@timwattenberg.de> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902191715230.30381@bofh.nohats.ca> <1F461BFA-638A-4607-84BD-F8B8597A1114@isc.org> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902200028210.29865@bofh.nohats.ca> <646C86F6-C10D-43DF-ADE8-19222994E4D1@hopcount.ca> <E41DDEED-DF50-481F-9378-D721C3612643@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902201928250.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <9330E97B-76BF-4C6F-8F6F-01349A3E7427@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902211215480.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAKW6Ri7u5uCwcXgDrovgpEnhZCpkGGDMrxLHxbFVNvnveUPwWA@mail.gmail.com> <382BAB3C-C127-46E1-B931-4717A33BD75A@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jC4gvRywLLkT_9QCnGgnO4xMF1Y>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:05:07 -0000

Hashes save space once the rdata is bigger than the hash.
-- 
Mark Andrews

> On 22 Feb 2019, at 02:12, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 21, 2019, at 6:11 AM, Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> wrote:
>> A more radical approach would be to have just one hash per item per record.
> 
> One way to make this document less complex yet just as useful would be to simply have a record that contains what is to be deleted, rather than a hash of what is to be deleted.   It’s not at all clear to me that there’s value in using the hash—to me it just seems to create uncertainty.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop