IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-02.txt

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 28 July 2021 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5A43A1342 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=aF9d+gjq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=nj7OMy8d
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mjEvKBrv7vbl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C5583A1349 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31940 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2021 00:32:09 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=7cc2.6100a589.k2107; bh=YLFWdm1Oprb6B/jqS7tacqzLMvUzWxagLLAlWAD8NZk=; b=aF9d+gjqGQJkkyx34YV2LlFLTzZrHXYGtgwITO/bHoRl5WWTNzXidW0fZ9kjaUBEY5x1Q2/I2BfSwQ1D97ms9VnTKLKxMRKvGPXByyXM008f5VE4b99zDtaTvtxuxPs64g6YzNhy65tZOx2qHA7qHR7hk5KXrn1mDmFv66C060TA2GJFwhA6IxCTGJH54TM+9pnQDPd7kJyOV1dNl7dSqgwlcBy5SJYaY9eVmOm4SQ9eza7qxveLYTqanSLk1PlwxnXi/ys9+9jmjrLtoY5s6am9w0Yp5L9ofp0dNj0jz7tYs9Df1EAfbYylodAQh47OZ0uJkQqOlV22atb5Szhtmg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=7cc2.6100a589.k2107; bh=YLFWdm1Oprb6B/jqS7tacqzLMvUzWxagLLAlWAD8NZk=; b=nj7OMy8dTjnydzyR5XMTpISeiExfnsp4EN4tut+GqZX6o1hUfUiVyHLPnjrTujgwIdglEOYWWh13sZdSmyfc0OXNrHP7zjs1VBQmGKEIGMTwc8JWMhSm6BdeAWFNM0YOhvjf7I/hSpqkIRWL/KZDllW9jY8Xd0ZbcA9klajXwBw8Dw2waYvmoEbUxzmpWvthCTiRJypNOL6w7R6tfQUMUefO03IwfuP3o81cClIXCO2AMUvm0W8EVl3N1+gMethsbTBfcxgAh9K/R4ZY1zEw7VciiDtCGVwnmxZ6nEYyPZo8fWQER+9a5geoYhZoKzhWUQhZwPTyzl9Ep4yjLRUUhQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 28 Jul 2021 00:32:09 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id A8B402539366; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:32:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478FE2539348; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:32:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:32:09 -0400
Message-ID: <4897dd4-7199-c32b-53d0-67a357b2f1e1@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdX4jwn=U9ONkuGd_LU0cgcGVyNpy7=aHnjqtX8MHTj2tg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9_gVstayRZufjKbi3TgKxnsg-Jt52y1Z3Znnmocyf_iSdoiQ@mail.gmail.com> <20210727201504.2939B25365A4@ary.qy> <CAHPuVdX4jwn=U9ONkuGd_LU0cgcGVyNpy7=aHnjqtX8MHTj2tg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/rP-zGKVPxReLq-PQBNRNBnJ75vw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:32:20 -0000

>> We say that authoritative servers MUST return all the glue, which is true
>> for real glue, but not true for sibling glue (unless the sibling is in
>> a loop which is not something to encourage.)  Let's not confuse people, please.
>
> Just to make sure we're talking about the same thing, the definition of
> sibling glue is glue from another zone delegated from the same parent.

That's not what the example in 4.1 of the draft shows.  It has foo.test 
depending on ns1.bar.test, so the server adds the A record for 
ns1.bar.test.

If we can't even agree what sibling glue is, perhaps we should snip it out.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status