Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Sat, 07 April 2018 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B7812AF84 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 02:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WeKMBidg-bRN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 02:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [185.49.140.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C975412AF83 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 02:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.22] (j48230.upc-j.chello.nl [24.132.48.230]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23DE3862B; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 11:41:38 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=none header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1523094098; bh=BBWGLdk3hTiIQ1YoxrPe2Inv6JkQwrHk0eGgIUVVBm8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=j1wBDAKawKFWYozGJdM1wXlseXo1XHwqRTus32avHqp4f/74y2A8FRzNqJvQm585Y 0KXMg2sjn1IOdE4pFgJCTZ3YyqmJr2EOt0rEaRQl0cqrAuwEA3RGi06gC6aget42vF EzqamZa8SIcjt67BG72/ahFYbgE+WqZo/oxvWriM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLTJUdTt_YnuC+sw2aNB10iGZ4bbcmOnf4i-y5Zssu0qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 11:41:37 +0200
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0BFC4D45-D6B1-41D7-9BBE-6FF89BAF98F3@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <CADyWQ+EE9YCCM03wKvd-HefpoQVqhOfeeLKLV8L2LJj+tqmEzA@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC936z-4j8e+d7bvhfr_Mk8tk64tkuiRDTRtrqrBTJBKJw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLgTvPHe5jeL-0QZJ4+cxes8bBpCEULuDKThpjXoKzrbA@mail.gmail.com> <20180406134501.GC49550@vurt.meerval.net> <4A943DE7-81BC-41AC-93F7-4EC0975DF6B6@gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLTJUdTt_YnuC+sw2aNB10iGZ4bbcmOnf4i-y5Zssu0qw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/u--elZPjCaqzRK4T5Ev8mHcGktM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2018 09:41:42 -0000

Hi Suzanne, Warren, DNSOP WG,

> On 7 Apr 2018, at 04:09, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> WG vendors/implementers: Can folks who have implemented kskroll-sentinel, or considered implementing it, please speak up on your concerns/plans?
> 
> Yup, that would be helpful  - bits I know of are that Knot has an
> implementation based on an earlier version (with a different label),
> and Petr says that it will be some time before they are able to update
> it; I've never touched Lua, if I get a chance I might try patch their
> implementation with the new strings ("Hold my beer" / "How hard can it
> be?")).
> I think I heard that ISC was considering adding support, but was
> planning on waiting till RFC / some sort of LC.
> 

NLnet Labs is planning to add kskroll-sentinel support soon.  We will report progress and feedback to the authors of the kskroll-sentinel draft.

Code will be made available in our repository and asap be part of the Unbound release (for packaging & distribution).

Cheers,

— Benno


-- 
Benno J. Overeinder
NLnet Labs
https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/