IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-kumari-ogud-dnsop-cds-02.txt

John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jad@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BC921F9AC2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yRTOtkeiDUGS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpanelsmarthost1.zen.co.uk (cpanelsmarthost1.zen.co.uk [82.71.204.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867D421F9DBA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [88.98.24.67] (helo=shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk) by cpanelsmarthost1.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jad@sinodun.com>) id 1UxItY-0000ni-M9 for dnsop@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:35:00 +0000
Received: from 82-68-198-190.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk ([82.68.198.190]:29546 helo=[192.168.1.34]) by shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <jad@sinodun.com>) id 1UxItQ-00026h-FS; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:34:52 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <A82661B1-414B-435C-B359-53BC0F17EEA3@ogud.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:34:53 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BE353BD0-17FD-426B-BDFA-AAF647EFFA8E@sinodun.com>
References: <20130617165829.2638.88322.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DD7454F5-6B16-4EBA-A380-C51E2302E5E9@kumari.net> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1306171417150.18979@bofh.nohats.ca> <0lsj0b2kk5.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <51C96B62.9030401@nlnetlabs.nl> <2350A43B-088E-4BEA-9317-98B8372C74BE@ogud.com> <51D18336.5010401@nlnetlabs.nl> <9245734C-D614-41C4-B2FC-C39D6DAAA5C3@ogud.com> <8E20305A-4B51-4714-B339-0C5703E75828@sinodun.com> <A82661B1-414B-435C-B359-53BC0F17EEA3@ogud.com>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sinodun.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk: authenticated_id: jad+sinodun.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-kumari-ogud-dnsop-cds-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:35:08 -0000

On 8 Jul 2013, at 18:03, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:

> John,
> 
> Thanks for a excellent and timely review we just about pushing out a new version when it arrived. 
> 
> We have accepted most of your edits and suggestions except when the text was already removed/reworded. 
> 
> Instead I want to focus on your Q1: "How will a ``Child'' know if the ``Parent'' is doing CDS?" 
> IMHO, we need to figure out how/if to place a flag in parent saying what kinds of "sync" it is willing to do from signed children. 

I don't see the point of a flag. Since the auth servers for the child and parent never talk to each other the child would have to set up some tool to see the flag. It seems likely to me that the parent would have to give info about  such a flag on a web page somewhere so the web page might as well be the flag.

regards
John

---
jad@sinodun.com

http://sinodun.com

Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd.
Stables 4, Suite 11,
Howbery Park,
Wallingford,
Oxfordshire,
OX10 8BA,
U.K.

+44 (0)1491 834957

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email