Re: [Dots] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-21.txt

Hi Med,

Thanks. I also got distracted to check the right number... but this is now
done.

Yours,
Daniel

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 9:34 AM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> Re-,
>
> Apologies, I meant [RFC8782][RFC8783] that should normally be available by
> the end of the IETF LC for this draft.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
> > mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> > Envoyé : vendredi 29 mai 2020 14:43
> > À : Daniel Migault (daniel.migault@ericsson.com)
> > Cc : dots@ietf.org; Benjamin Kaduk
> > Objet : Re: [Dots] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dots-
> > use-cases-21.txt
> >
> > Hi Daniel, all,
> >
> > Apologies for the late comment, but can you please make the following
> > change in the next iteration of the draft:
> >
> > OLD:
> >    This document provides sample use cases that provided input for the
> >    design of the DOTS protocols.
> >
> > NEW:
> >    This document provides sample use cases that provided input for the
> >    design of the DOTS protocols [RFC8772][RFC8773].
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Med
> >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Benjamin
> > Kaduk
> > > Envoyé : jeudi 28 mai 2020 22:55
> > > À : Daniel Migault
> > > Cc : dots@ietf.org
> > > Objet : Re: [Dots] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dots-
> > > use-cases-21.txt
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:05:29PM +0000, Daniel Migault wrote:
> > > > Please find the version 21 that considers all feed backs - or at
> > > least my understanding of them - that we received until now.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the updates; I'll go ahead and kick off the IETF LC.
> > >
> > > It does look like one of my editorial comments was not understood as
> > I
> > > intended, but we can treat that as we would a LC comment:
> > >
> > >
> > > Section 1
> > >
> > >    As DDoS solutions are broadly heterogeneous among vendors, the
> > >    primary goal of DOTS is to provide high-level interaction amongst
> > >    differing DDoS solutions, such as detecting, initiating,
> > > terminating
> > >    DDoS mitigation assistance or requesting the status of a DDoS
> > >    mitigation.
> > >
> > > nit: the list structure is not properly parallel.  It looks like the
> > > various clauses are meant to be "detecting DDoS",
> > > "initiating/terminating mitigation assistance", and "requesting
> > > mitigation status", so maybe this could become:
> > >
> > > % As DDoS solutions are broadly heterogeneous among vendors, the
> > > % primary goal of DOTS is to provide high-level interaction amongst
> > > % differing DDoS solutions, such as detecting DDoS attacks,
> > > % initiating/terminating DDoS mitigation assistance, or requesting
> > the
> > > % status of a DDoS mitigation.
> > >
> > > The -21 adds the '/' in "initiating/terminating DDoS mitigation
> > > assistance"
> > > but there were a few other changes in my proposal that are needed to
> > > make
> > > the list structure parallel.  E.g., the full phrase "detecting DDoS
> > > attacks" and the serial comma.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Ben
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dots mailing list
> > > Dots@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dots mailing list
> > Dots@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>

-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson