Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS?

Hi all,

+1
The DOTS protocol is a great protocol because it has a clear problem
statement and the ability to solve the problem.
I would like to thank everyone involved in the DOTS protocol,
especially those who gave advice on our draft in spite of my poor
English.

Thanks,
Yuhei

2023年3月29日(水) 10:50 Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>:
>
> +1 congratulation to participants, chairs and ADs!
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 9:18 PM 陈美玲 <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> +1, Many thanks to the WG participants and Chairs，DOTS was my first WG to start IETF, the cooperation is excellent, and look forward to more cooperation.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Meiling
>>
>>
>>
>> ----邮件原文----
>> 发件人：tirumal reddy  <kondtir@gmail.com>
>> 收件人："mohamed.boucadair" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
>> 抄　送: "supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com" <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com>,"dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>,Valery Smyslov  <valery@smyslov.net>,"dots-chairs@ietf.org" <dots-chairs@ietf.org>,Paul Wouters  <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
>> 发送时间：2023-03-28 13:04:22
>> 主题：Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS?
>>
>> +1, Awesome collaboration among the WG participants and the several hackathon sessions that led to hardened specifications. Many thanks to the DOTS WG chairs and Security ADs.
>>
>> On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 11:06, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I also think that it is time to close.
>>>
>>> Many thanks to the WG participants and Chairs, especially for the good and positive collaboration spirit. I personally enjoyed working in this WG.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Med
>>>
>>> > -----Message d'origine-----
>>> > De : Dots <dots-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de supjps-
>>> > ietf@jpshallow.com
>>> > Envoyé : mardi 28 mars 2023 00:35
>>> > À : dots@ietf.org; Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
>>> > Cc : dots-chairs@ietf.org; 'Paul Wouters' <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
>>> > Objet : Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS?
>>> >
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I think the DOTS WG has run its natural course and can come to an
>>> > end.
>>> >
>>> > Many thanks to all that have worked on DOTS - good to work with
>>> > people who are clear thinkers, have good ideas and were prepared to
>>> > check out the practical usability in the real (but aggressive!)
>>> > world.
>>> >
>>> > I also will never stop being amazed at those for whom English was not
>>> > their first language being able to sort out (as someone who is
>>> > British and should know better) my incompressible grammar into
>>> > something that made even better sense.  Well done!
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> >
>>> > Jon
>>> >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: Valery Smyslov [mailto: valery@smyslov.net]
>>> > > Sent: 27 March 2023 15:55
>>> > > To: dots@ietf.org
>>> > > Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org; 'Paul Wouters'
>>> > > Subject: [Dots] Closing DOTS?
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > the DOTS WG has completed all its tasks according to the current
>>> > > charter (the last WG draft - telemetry use cases is in the RFC
>>> > Editor
>>> > > queue and will hopefully be published soon).
>>> > >
>>> > > Additionally, we don't have any new discussion on the list for
>>> > quite a
>>> > long time
>>> > > and we skipped 3 IETF meetings for this reason.
>>> > >
>>> > > The chairs discussed this with the responsible AD and we came to a
>>> > conclusion
>>> > > that it's time to close the group or recharter it if there is an
>>> > > interest in more work items related to DOTS.
>>> > >
>>> > > So, our question to the WG - should the group be closed?
>>> > > And if the answer is no, then what are new items the WG can work on
>>> > > after its recharter?
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > Valery (for chairs)
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Dots mailing list
>>> > > Dots@ietf.org
>>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Dots mailing list
>>> > Dots@ietf.org
>>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>>
>>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dots mailing list
>>> Dots@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dots mailing list
>> Dots@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Migault
> Ericsson
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots

-- 
----------------------------------
Yuuhei HAYASHI
08065300884
yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com
iehuuy_0220@docomo.ne.jp
----------------------------------